-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/07/02/spam-twitter-trends/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
4 hours ago · 81 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
3 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
5 hours ago · 26 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
2 hours ago · 14 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Reminds why I stopped reading Mashable a long time ago.
Why are people saying that this is spam when the number 1 trending topic is in fact spam organised by a company over the giveaway of a laptop for promotional purposes. Pick on them instead!
Secondly, in hindsight (especially if you're familiar with the actress or the series), it seems to have been easy to simply Google the term. And yes, this was definitely poor research. But it never occurred to me, even in the back of my mind, that this might be a legitimate term; that's what years of receiving spammy emails do to you.
outside the Twitterverse would tell me before I jump to the conclusion
that it's spam. The fact that clicking on the topic yields no results
is the real story here.
"This time, an odd, vulgar hashtag has appeared in the trending topics"
to
"This time, an odd, hashtag has appeared in the trending topics"
The newly added closing paras are a good point but a mea culpa might be better.
I think it's important that the original text is left as is - even if updates are added or score thrus used.
There's an interesting story here, really, pity it'll get overshadowed by my mistake. Are certain (possibly) vulgar words allowed in Twitter trending topics? How should Twitter go about discerning whether something is spam or not? It's not an easy task, as you can see (;.
I'm actually not that worried about Twitter spam filters - without any filter there would be the potential for p0rn spam to clog up the trending topics. Simple human oversight solves the problem - presuming they can o'ride the filters.
I think the story is more, what are the trending topics for and how should we react to people and esp. companies 'gaming them'? It's foreseeable that as more companies use twitter to promote comps etc... that almost the entire trending topics list could be brand terms.
At that point it's no longer useful - unless you want to enter loads of competitions.
Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz
I agree with the others - this is lazy journalism.
British actress Mollie Sugden died yesterday. She played Mrs Slocombe in UK comedy Are You Being Served and 'Mrs Slocombe's Pussy' was a running joke. This is a tribute from fans.
TechCrunch just ran with the same, story: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again... and got quite a backlash.
It has a valid place in the trending topics, many top celeb twits are encouraging the use of the hashtag as a memorial.
The Mrs. Slocombe character from Are You Being Served always referred to her cat Tiddles as 'my pussy'. It was a running joke and the one most associated with Mollie Sugden, who died yesterday. Check it on http://whatthetrend.com.
If the topic in case was #CheapViagra I would have probably done the same mistake (:. Again, not making excuses, the mistake is mine, just picking my brain to see why I never thought of googling that term (:
Twitter trying to filter out searches of hash-tags with "naughty" words in, perhaps? But failing to do that for trending topics.
#MrsSlocombesPussy refers to the actress Mollie Sugden, who died yesterday.
Twitter admins appear to have reacted as you did, Stan, and have blocked the search results, despite the fact that it's a legitimate trending topic. An interesting lesson in parochial US standards, maybe? In the words of Morrissey, "America is not the world".
A standing joke on the programme was where Mrs Slocombe(an elderly lady) would innocently use "the P word" to refer to her CAT. In 70s Britain the word then only had a slight sexual undertone.
Mollie Sugden died 2 July: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/812961...
REF for Are You Being Served? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Are_You_Being_Served
A standing joke on the programme was where Mrs Slocombe(an elderly lady) would innocently use "the P word" to refer to her CAT. In 70s Britain the word then only had a slight sexual undertone.
Mollie Sugden died 2 July: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/812961...
REF for Are You Being Served? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Are_You_Being_Served
A standing joke on the programme was where Mrs Slocombe(an elderly lady) would innocently use "the P word" to refer to her CAT. In 70s Britain the word then only had a slight sexual undertone.
Mollie Sugden died 2 July: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/812961...
REF for Are You Being Served? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Are_You_Being_Served
Lets not loose the point here though, for me its the spam on twitter and the amount that its infringing on the whole system. Its beginning to get totally out of control. I wrote a post just last night suggesting a way we could combat it but not in the trends, that seems to be a separate issue altogether and the worry is that it will make the trends obsolete.
Have a read of this and see what you think, maybe I'm mental but it sounds like a feasible idea to me. http://www.justinparks.com/eat-spam-twitter-bot/
What happened to real journalism, ya know, when you vetted things, or maybe researched a LITTLE?
Something else to remember is that in other cases, is what one person considers to be spam is someone else's perfectly honest and decent advertising message. It's sad that some people will use links to be malicious, but there are other people - including myself - for whom Twitter is a legitimate and useful way to get our business message out. The network marketing gurus are telling everyone that Twitter SHOULD be used in this way. So who can blame us for taking notice and doing it.
http://www.dmr-bs750.org.uk
Social Steve
www.socialsteve.wordpress.com
http://www.gospelrhys.co.uk/2009/07/hate-to-say...
http://www.gospelrhys.co.uk/2009/07/hate-to-say...