-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/04/01/slideshare-april-fools/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
3 hours ago · 81 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
3 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
4 hours ago · 26 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
2 hours ago · 14 comments
-
BREAKING: Google Launches Real-Time Search Results
1 day ago · 96 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
oh wah wah wah they made me look like a fool in front of my networks.
maybe they just helped reveal your true colors.
(Besides, isn't looking foolish the whole point of April FOOLS Day?)
With my professional credibility and my family's survival at stake, I'm also "too proud" and too busy to waste time with kiddie jokes.
OK, on to the next option.....good thing I checked out these Not-Ready-For-Prime-Time-Players before clicking the "add app" button! Thanks for all the good info, people.
NMRK
People take themselves WAY too seriously these days.
It's questionable for a business to run the risk of embarrassing its customers.
It's downright weird that they would set out to do it.
I'm sure next year, Social Media companies will reconsider the value of an April Fool's Joke beyond the internal confines of their office.
Way to ruin your customer relationships. Nothing say "I don't care about you" more than a cheap joke at someone expense.
Chris - You make some good points but Slideshare's joke idea is a lousy one. Any customers who did check wasted their time digging into a joke. Any way you slice it, Slideshare undermined the trust they'd built with customers.
As someone who was the recipient of this little hoax, I have to say that I'm not impressed. I have spent countless hours trying to help my organization understand that social media is a credible, measurable and highly effective tool in the marketing mix.
Having just recently uploaded a slideshow that saw over 1,300 views in one day, I used this is a case study to show how quickly good ideas can spread...and how many impressions our brand can make. Well, I guess the joke is now on me. When those views jumped to 100,300+ a few hours later, guess how credible and measurable that tool was in the eyes of my organization.
April Fool's jokes have no place in business. This sounds like a classic case of a company (Slideshare) loosing sight of who their subscribers are. I suspect many of them, like me, are business people. As I said on Twitter: This hoax of putting 2 extra 0s next to my number of views is about as funny as sending an invoice to my client with a few extra 0s...letting them stew over it for a day...then telling them: "don't worry, it was just an April Fool's joke!".
30 minutes later I was almost sure that there is something going on... :-))
It just wasn't funny. Perhaps it was funny to the vendor, but there was no real "laugh value" for anyone watching. Certainly not a great image a company would want to show...
I'm sorry that some people still think that makin jokes prevents you from being a credible source; I was educated with humour being treated as a sign of confidence.
Or maybe, had they done this on a day when people knew not to take things seriously.
Not the best joke of April, 1, but before tweeting a message it's better to check the validity of what will be your statement: check the number of visitors for your presentation, seach the suggested hash #bestofslideshare.
Here is a result just noted:
just deleted all my slides from slideshare #bestofslideshare
Carmen
I think folks will only look foolish if they make a big deal out of it.
I feel sorry for the people who fell for it , and that includes me too.
What people want on April fools' day is not to be branded as a fool, by friends,co-workers or family members.
Its not a motivating thing to be fooled by some stupid slide uploading site that we happen to upload our slides once in a while.
Shame on Slideshare, i hope they get the humiliation they brought upon their users.
I also indicated that some would feel that anyone who expressed disappointment are limited to those who take themselves far too seriously.
I have never been reluctant to use self-deprecating humor - after all if we cannot laugh at ourselves as the saying goes . . .
However, I truly do rely on SlideShare's numbers to inform clients about read activity. And while 20,000 reads was an hugely "optimistic" number, one also considers the source in weighing the veracity of the information. And as a side note, meteoric increases are possible as my blog's syndicated readership base grew from 0 when it was launched in May 2007 to reaching 300,000 syndicated subscribers each month worldwide by August 2008.
Perhaps that's what made it a great prank was the fact that no one could see it coming. On the other hand, to arrive at that point of creditability (re being a trusted source of info) is something that is earned and maintained through an organization's conduct or actions. Ultimately, SlideShare's hard earned creditability is what created the degree of trust that opened the door to making one susceptible to the prank in the first place.
In hindsight, is this really the way SlideShare wanted to leverage that trust?
Once again, and as demonstrated by a couple of comments below, there will certainly be some to tell others that they have to get a life and not take the situation or themselves so seriously. In the end however, SlideShare has to ask if their little joke furthered their organization's best interests (i.e. added to the trust that people have in the company), or as it hurt it?
That is a question that should have been asked before hand.
As for me I will take my lumps because I am a big boy, and that's life. But I will never view SlideShare in the same light, nor will I honestly look at the their statistics with the same level of confidence I had prior to this morning.
One final note: I have a number of secured documents re papers which can only be accessed through the utilization of a tightly controlled password. Unfortunately, it would appear that SlideShare deemed these documents to be a target as well as they are showing a higher level of reads than warranted by internal verification. I hope that someone from SlideShare will get back to me to let me know that it is indeed part of the prank and not a more serious security breach with their system.
I also indicated that some would feel that anyone who expressed disappointment are limited to those who take themselves far too seriously.
I have never been reluctant to use self-deprecating humor - after all if we cannot laugh at ourselves as the saying goes . . .
However, I truly do rely on SlideShare's numbers to inform clients about read activity. And while 20,000 reads was an hugely "optimistic" number, one also considers the source in weighing the veracity of the information. And as a side note, meteoric increases are possible as my blog's syndicated readership base grew from 0 when it was launched in May 2007 to reaching 300,000 syndicated subscribers each month worldwide by August 2008.
Perhaps that's what made it a great prank was the fact that no one could see it coming. On the other hand, to arrive at that point of creditability (re being a trusted source of info) is something that is earned and maintained through an organization's conduct or actions. Ultimately, SlideShare's hard earned creditability is what created the degree of trust that opened the door to making one susceptible to the prank in the first place.
In hindsight, is this really the way SlideShare wanted to leverage that trust?
Once again, and as demonstrated by a couple of comments below, there will certainly be some to tell others that they have to get a life and not take the situation or themselves so seriously. In the end however, SlideShare has to ask if their little joke furthered their organization's best interests (i.e. added to the trust that people have in the company), or as it hurt it?
That is a question that should have been asked before hand.
As for me I will take my lumps because I am a big boy, and that's life. But I will never view SlideShare in the same light, nor will I honestly look at the their statistics with the same level of confidence I had prior to this morning.
One final note: I have a number of secured documents re papers which can only be accessed through the utilization of a tightly controlled password. Unfortunately, it would appear that SlideShare deemed these documents to be a target as well as they are showing a higher level of reads than warranted by internal verification. I hope that someone from SlideShare will get back to me to let me know that it is indeed part of the prank and not a more serious security breach with their system.
I also indicated that some would feel that anyone who expressed disappointment are limited to those who take themselves far too seriously.
I have never been reluctant to use self-deprecating humor - after all if we cannot laugh at ourselves as the saying goes . . .
However, I truly do rely on SlideShare's numbers to inform clients about read activity. And while 20,000 reads was an hugely "optimistic" number, one also considers the source in weighing the veracity of the information. And as a side note, meteoric increases are possible as my blog's syndicated readership base grew from 0 when it was launched in May 2007 to reaching 300,000 syndicated subscribers each month worldwide by August 2008.
Perhaps that's what made it a great prank was the fact that no one could see it coming. On the other hand, to arrive at that point of creditability (re being a trusted source of info) is something that is earned and maintained through an organization's conduct or actions. Ultimately, SlideShare's hard earned creditability is what created the degree of trust that opened the door to making one susceptible to the prank in the first place.
In hindsight, is this really the way SlideShare wanted to leverage that trust?
Once again, and as demonstrated by a couple of comments below, there will certainly be some to tell others that they have to get a life and not take the situation or themselves so seriously. In the end however, SlideShare has to ask if their little joke furthered their organization's best interests (i.e. added to the trust that people have in the company), or as it hurt it?
That is a question that should have been asked before hand.
As for me I will take my lumps because I am a big boy, and that's life. But I will never view SlideShare in the same light, nor will I honestly look at the their statistics with the same level of confidence I had prior to this morning.
One final note: I have a number of secured documents re papers which can only be accessed through the utilization of a tightly controlled password. Unfortunately, it would appear that SlideShare deemed these documents to be a target as well as they are showing a higher level of reads than warranted by internal verification. I hope that someone from SlideShare will get back to me to let me know that it is indeed part of the prank and not a more serious security breach with their system.
We're sorry if we hurt your feelings, we didn't mean to make you look foolish (even on April 1st).
The real question is: was this a smart move? Was the guerilla marketing buzz generated worth the possible alienation of some of the site’s users? And more importantly what does this do to their brand? What does Slideshare want us to think about their brand? Do they want to be the LinkedIn of presentation sites, or do they want to be the MySpace? In that light, I think that this was not a very smart move. For me personally, it makes me think that Slideshare is a little frivolous and not entirely professional. It makes any information from SS slightly suspect in my eyes…maybe only slightly, but do you ever want your brand to be considered even slightly suspect? If you think that makes me a humorless dolt who ‘needs to lighten up and take my self less seriously…” well so be it. I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. But I have to say that messing with your brand image in such unstable times is risky at best.
The bad thing about social media is that so can a silly or perhaps even a very bad idea.
Mike
It can cause a big loss of professional respect from all avenues, and complicate or even stall a career.
On another note... I have a few presentations on Slideshare. I used it to convert some powerpoint shows into embeds for a blog, nothing serious in nature... but I didn't get one of those invitations or e-mails this article mentioned.
Or maybe they could have a good product, I hear that drives traffic.
You might have heard about our April Fool's joke that blew up in our face. Because of the embarrassment and damage that this prank has caused our brand, we have decided that it might be a good idea to hire someone who knows a thing or two about social media, or even just basic etiquette.
Responsibilities Include:
Apologizing to current customers.
Sending personal emails to all current customers who were punked and personally asking for forgiveness.
Explaining to customers why they should trust your site and should re-add your application to their LinkedIn profiles.
Expertise with justifying boneheaded moves by your colleagues.
Requirements:
Must have at least some knowledge of social media applications as well as fluency with the following programs: Groveling 2.0, SlideShaft 4.1.09 and MiaCulpa for Windows Vista.
you got too much EGO built up. Learn to let it go and you will get hurt less.
Great prank, IMO.
But the "get a sense of humor" people here seem to miss the fact that I and many of my colleagues use Slideshare to build credibility in our professions. My slideshows have gotten me clients. The last thing Slideshare should want to do is to harm customers' businesses by damaging their credibility. This trick shows that Slideshare staff don't have the professional approach that many of us will now be looking for in a different slide-embedding site.
What puzzles me is how many people put bad presentations on that site, or rather presentation were slides lack too much information to make the service relevant per se. Some do include audio (usually that's disappointing, but it's a personal opinion) but it's rare; I might be missing the far more relevant use of sharing a slide on-line during a conference call — but then, a prank on stats would be toothless.
Don't blame me: I only do animation-heavy presentations, and I can't find a service to host them that would include that and needed presenter notes (and maybe sound too).
keep laughing,
-rob
However the You Tube example is really good. It's obvious, fun and you get to watch a bunch of videos upside down for a few hours. I may only be in a camp of one but I did like the Guardian April fools as well...
Anyway, I think yes, Slideshare has indeed scored a strategic goal - so many people talking about them..amazing PR..negative publicity too, but not bad..
I empathize with those who had to look like fools in front of their networks, but that's fine..this is still way better than talking about twitter on twitter all the time, right?
A great deal of time and planning goes into a presentation. People are working harder for each piece of business today and every milestone is reason for celebration. To get people excited about their increase in viewing status, then ask them to broadcast it on Twitter, while SlideShare’s staff followed the joke online was in very bad taste.
SlideShare’s goal was to increase traffic and awareness to their website, at the expensive of member’s embarrassment. Good PR? I don’t believe so and they obviously realized that this “joke” wasn’t viewed as humorous, by their quick apology to their existing members.
I though it was a tool invented by Kafka to keep middle-management busy. ;^)
(The real story about the program was recently featured on Wired, BTW.)
and they're
THE FOOL!