<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/shorturl_feud_trim_slams_twitter_and_bitly_goes_open_source/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:54:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-15245152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forget all the drama, just make your own URL shortener with WordPress and PrettyLink. Then you're in charge of your own links and can prevent rot or delete URLs as necessary. If everyone did this then we'd have a massively distributed database that wouldn't have a single point of failure, like &lt;a href="http://tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tr.im"&gt;tr.im&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt;. Here's my link back to this article: &lt;a href="http://ryaniam.com/5m2" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ryaniam.com/5m2"&gt;http://ryaniam.com/5m2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:54:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-15043162</link><description>&lt;p&gt;5676 riverdale chestnut llc holdings worst lanlord in bronx&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">josefina</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:07:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-15012060</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like stukes’ comment, there are peoples who would just casually use the shortener then forget it. They might not even realize if there’s stats for the short url, or how to use it.&lt;br&gt;Is this a majority or minority, average people or high-profiled, I don’t know.&lt;br&gt;I only use &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; actively for posting in company’s Twitter, and that’s for the marketing folks’ data anyway.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But if I had something I’d like to just share and leave, I’ll just post the real link to Twitter and let it handle the rest (use &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; ?). As long as the redirect work for now. So choice is not really a concern.&lt;br&gt;Except maybe… Twitter give a ballot screen the first time the user need URL shortened.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seika</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:55:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-15005544</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would like Twitter or any service to be as open as possible concerning link shorteners. Twitter should give us an option when they shorten urls. Being "biased" against one service creates a monopoly.&lt;br&gt;I also use &lt;a href="http://is.gd" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="is.gd"&gt;is.gd&lt;/a&gt; when I don't feed items. However, &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; is very reliable that's why I use it for my feeds. However, an option on Twitter, just like &lt;a href="http://twitterfeed.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitterfeed.com"&gt;twitterfeed.com&lt;/a&gt; is using, will benefit the URL shortening market.&lt;br&gt;I welcome the open source movement by &lt;a href="http://tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tr.im"&gt;tr.im&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NielDLR</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:20:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14999166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like someone is a sore loser. The owner of &lt;a href="http://Tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Tr.im"&gt;Tr.im&lt;/a&gt; should wipes his eyes, re-apply his makeup and come up with a more original way to make himself some money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaveA</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14994569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;its a great move brother &lt;br&gt;u rock ... now a lot of kid's like me  .. will try using ur code to innovate and comeup wid another ShortURL DOT COM ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and 10K is like dirty offer ... it is no good ... just this domain name shuld fetch a lot more ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Premier League News</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14990124</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree, I do the same. I have stopped using Nambu client after &lt;a href="http://Tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Tr.im"&gt;Tr.im&lt;/a&gt; shutdown. My tweet mostly are link sharing, and I don't want my tweet link become 404 in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Tr.im"&gt;Tr.im&lt;/a&gt; attitude is like a junior student, because his friend has better bags and had more friend and also teacher's favorite.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ncus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:01:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14986197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i personally didnt favor one over the other until &lt;a href="http://tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tr.im"&gt;tr.im&lt;/a&gt; started making abrupt decisions with little warning. as others feel, i care more about the stability of my links. &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; it is from here on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TwBugg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:48:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14984492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Open source, woot!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adamsonx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:08:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14980944</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the Isle of Mann sinks we're all doomed! In the Real-Time web who cares weather or not my link still resolves a month from now? BTW &lt;a href="http://u.nu" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://u.nu"&gt;http://u.nu&lt;/a&gt; rules!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14980483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had to try &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; when &lt;a href="http://tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tr.im"&gt;tr.im&lt;/a&gt; was down but &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; is just worse in terms of features, usability and stat. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:35:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14978946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;trim is doomed regardless.&lt;br&gt;but so is &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;who cares about this&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SuperGarth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:59:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14978909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, I've never liked &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; and was a loyal &lt;a href="http://Tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Tr.im"&gt;Tr.im&lt;/a&gt; user... but when they shut down with out any warning and started bitching about &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt;, I've moved completely over to &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt;.  Twitter politics aside, I just want to stick with the company that's not going to disappear on me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amsoell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:58:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14978315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;URL shortners are a stupid idea.  Going open source is interesting, but ultimately takes away people's privacy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">personne</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:43:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14978125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unbelievable.  This is just sad!  &lt;a href="http://Tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Tr.im"&gt;Tr.im&lt;/a&gt;, give up.  Not only are you not doing well as a service, but you're not even doing well in terms of public relations.  &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; is dominating and you are just jealous.  Go big or go home.  If you're gonna throw a hissy fit, type it out on Twitter and then press the backspace key a whole heck of a lot, because *nobody* cares!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Geller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:39:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14977825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't understand what the big deal is. So what twitter uses &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt;, you can still use whatever other one you want anyway. &lt;br&gt;Also why bash twitter, isn't twitter the whole reason for the demand in URL shorteners. Tell what else causes such a high demand of short url's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Walter Beazy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14977668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@stukes, many people don't want to "forget about" their links. Some wants stats. Others want bookmarks. And a few want to measure results for companies, clients or themselves. In a "Link Economy," URL shorteners are like receipts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kawika</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:30:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14977415</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They are making this out to be way bigger than it really is...I am starting a new one skm.balz&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TWlTTERLOGOS.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:27:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14977314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"&lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; and Twitter have monopolized the market and are the ones creating the URL shortening crisis."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course a lot of people don't know about URL shortener they just keep on updating and twitter uses &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; or maybe owns &lt;a href="http://bit.ly?" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly?"&gt;bit.ly?&lt;/a&gt; sooooon?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Jaictin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:25:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14976913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see tons of other URL shorteners starting up once the source code goes open source. Not that it is hard to create one to begin with.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:22:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14976193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; and Twitter haven't made a monopoly because you are still able to use other url shorteners if you want.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joshua Novak</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14976161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i dont know if its just me, but i dont see how &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tr.im"&gt;tr.im&lt;/a&gt; are different. to the average person, all it does is make ur youtube video or G4 link shorter, then you forget about it. can some one explain to me why this is a big deal?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stukes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:11:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14975942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As with many Web 2.0 Innovations, it will be interesting to see how this shift effects the umbrella of URL shorteners-- or how any of these businesses can stay afloat/prosper/make money in the long run. As for "destroying innovation" -- well doesn't that seem like a bit of a contradictory term? Doesn't innovation thrive in, and gain its definition from challenging circumstances-- and seemingly "unsolvable" problems?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kim</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:07:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14975923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;InRev Systems have come up with a URL Shortening service called &lt;a href="http://nxy.in" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="nxy.in"&gt;nxy.in&lt;/a&gt; which will work together with Buzzom Web and Buzzom Desktop.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have built a business plan to benefit the users of &lt;a href="http://nxy.in" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="nxy.in"&gt;nxy.in&lt;/a&gt; directly thro ad management service. User just needs to use Buzzom service to tweet to earn money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I cannot write all the details here. our full fledged service for &lt;a href="http://nxy.in" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="nxy.in"&gt;nxy.in&lt;/a&gt; will come within a month.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Buzzom.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Buzzom.com"&gt;Buzzom.com&lt;/a&gt; is functional for Twitter Account Management, it will soon have Tweeting facility. Buzzom Desktop is the only Twitter Client with Spam control features which have hiding tweets like in Facebook. It is available at &lt;a href="http://www.buzzom.com/BuzzomLab" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.buzzom.com/BuzzomLab"&gt;http://www.buzzom.com/Buzzo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All the best for &lt;a href="http://tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tr.im"&gt;tr.im&lt;/a&gt; folks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bhupendra&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leplan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:06:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SHORTURL FEUD: Tr.im Slams Twitter and Bit.ly, Goes Open Source</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/17/tr-im-community-owned/#comment-14975707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Tr.im" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Tr.im"&gt;Tr.im&lt;/a&gt; is my favorite, but I'm using &lt;a href="http://Bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; for now, until things settle down. You never know what's going to happen next.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sachin Dharwadker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:02:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>