<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/reminder_google_is_not_the_internet_yet/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:17:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-7091698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stan, come on. I mean, like, everybody already knows AOL is the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fred</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6899724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quite true.. However, how do u define 'misinformation'? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">valencio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:50:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6879586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really can't see that ever happening. Google's function isn't to remove misinformation or anything similar to this even if the information might be incorrect. The other issue here is what  is defined as misinformation and what isn't and this in many cases this is a very grey area.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If someone writes or says something that others believe to be misinformation then it's very unlikely that Google or any other major Search Engine will ever take one side over another.&lt;br&gt;I agree with a previous comment that Google is correct in this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Essentially it is perfectly possible to build a webiste that is nothing but misinformation and then use SEO techniques to achieve top positions on Google even though the site might be full of nonsense. I can't see Google doing anything about this as their aim is not accuracy but relevance and the two are very different. This is a fascinating subject of discussion though and thankyou for the excellent blog post&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jeremy Spiller&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.whitehatmedia.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.whitehatmedia.com"&gt;http://www.whitehatmedia.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;To follow me on Twitter: &lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/jeremyspiller" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.twitter.com/jeremyspiller"&gt;http://www.twitter.com/jere...&lt;/a&gt;    &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">search engine marketing guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:36:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6878893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, if you ask me, thats a little nutty to expect GOOGLE to have to take off a website that spreads "Mis Information" Thats a HUGE JOB.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Isn't it up to the HOST of the server to take off any websites that breach certain "terms" of the internet? I mean, the HOST/SEVER is really the ulitmate one to take it off the net.. I know many hosts will shut down a site if it's inflicting malware or is spammy..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google shouldn't be held responsible &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lindayanng</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:13:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6876006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;my 94-year-old father thinks that "Google" and the "Internet" ARE the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If figured at 94 he did not really nead to hear his 40-something son tell him the difference.  Thus, for some, Google IS the internet!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thom singer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6870842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. I don't like the idea of Google censoring the web. What I'm after here is the fact that Google's actions towards some chunk of data on the net might ultimately become equally (or more) important as the actual web site that hosts it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stan_Schroeder</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6870367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;For now, however, Google only acts when sites are spammy or spread malware; perhaps in the future they will also need to consider whether they should act if a site spreads misinformation.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Uhm. No.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do not want Google to act as an arbitray censor for the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reducing the indexability (if taht is a word) of spammy or malware site -  yes, becuase those are actions designed to undermine how the 'tarnets actually continue to work. But spreading of misinformation ? Why then in theory Google would have to ban links to the entirity of Wikipedia!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google are at the very heart, a commercial enterpirse. I do not want any single business entity censoring what I can and cannot find on the internet. Yes I know I could access specific sites via another avene, but I might not be able to find them or know they exsist without them being google cahced first .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faintdreams</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6869565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Perhaps in the future they will also need to consider whether they should act if a site spreads misinformation "&lt;br&gt;Wow, THAT sounds scarry!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What would Google consider "misinformation"?&lt;br&gt;"Google sucks" &lt;br&gt;"Neil Armstrong  never walked on the moon"&lt;br&gt;"China media are free"&lt;br&gt;Which page or site containing one of those assertions would Google "block"?...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zackatoustra</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:38:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6869425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stan - It is amazing to witness the emergence of Google and their dominance in search along with it's growth into other web based platforms through acquisition. Your comments on just how deep our internet footprint really is causes one to pause and carefully consider what you post yourself and warrants monitoring what others are saying about you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From Google's perspective the question is openness and who decides how content posted in an open forum - if anyone. The Internet can be a two edged sword for some; I am fairly certain that I wouldn't want it any other way. This is an interesting topic, thank you for bringing it to light.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://Twitter.com/AskJamesHolmes" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://Twitter.com/AskJamesHolmes"&gt;http://Twitter.com/AskJames...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JamesHolmesOnline</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:32:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6869039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Article says: "...perhaps in the future they will also need to consider whether they should act if a site spreads misinformation." I don't think they will ever put themselves in a position to make this call. If they do, their search engine will lost it's integrity. Oddly enough, maintaining their search integrity results in Google crawling things that may go contrary to Google's human integrity, but that is the only way it can be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:13:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder: Google is Not the Internet (Yet)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/04/reminder-google-internet/#comment-6869020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope Google never acts on a site providing misinformation.  Part of what makes the web democratic is that both sides have a chance to voice their opinions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who is the to be the judge of who is right and who is wrong.  Fortunately, Google knows better than to fill that role.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Russ Adams</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:12:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>