<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/quote_5_words_from_the_associated_press_that8217ll_be_1250/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:48:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-20859563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AP is making a last ditch effort to save their business model which was nullified some time ago. They can try anything, just like anyone can sue anyone. But good luck. Like most of the corporate bullys they will try the little guy first, but won't take on the big money guys like google.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apgetreal</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:48:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-15569618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This plan has FAIL written all over it. Let us know how that works out for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:27:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14522152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Almost all of the twitter news services pull from AP.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wewillchange</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:13:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14446403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Memo to AP:  I think that's a grand idea.  As your readership tanks(mostly because you fail to print the truth), this will speed your demise.  You and Rupert must be on the same page.  Keep it up and don't forget to fall squarely on your sword. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:42:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14427309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is asinine. AP knows damn well that in US copyright law the concept of &lt;a href="http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html"&gt;fair use&lt;/a&gt; is both well established and well defined. If they start coming after people who are making legitimate use of their content under the umbrella of fair use, they will inevitable be smacked down in court and made to look like fools.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As others have pointed out here, this is just hamhanded scaremongering. If I legally quote AP in my creative work, I am doing them a favor, and they know it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaleA</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:02:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14416715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol... With so many writers proffering opinions these days, it's EASY to imagine identical 5 word strings. If they want to play at a 50 word level , fine, but other than that the AP needs to figure out that the world has changed and there are better ways to secure income than complete propriety. If they ever come looking to me for a fine, I will be more than happy to show them precisely which region of my hirsute glutes open to their kiss. In the meanwhile, Dear AP, Kindly exit to the nearest private place and concentrate all of your efforts on the finer art of self copulation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sevastian winters</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:16:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14416686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lol... With so many writers proffering opinions these days, it's EASY to imagine identical 5 word strings. If they want to play at a 50 word level , fine, but other than that the AP needs to figure out that the world has changed and there are better ways to secure income than complete propriety. If they ever come looking to me for a fine, I will be more than happy to show them precisely which region of my hirsute glutes open to their kiss. In the meanwhile, Dear AP, Kindly exit to the nearest private place and concentrate all of your efforts on the finer art of self copulation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sevastian winters</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:14:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14407008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about the "Share" button right on the ap news pages on yahoo?  If I push that button, does that mean I have to pay the ap for whatever pops up on twitter and my blog.... even though they made the "Share" button so easy to use?  Where is the disclaimer that pushing the "Share" button will cost me $12.50?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith Coogan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:01:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14403739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's boycott AP.  I can get the same information (worded differently) from other news sites anyway.  I say we should just boycott because our community watchdogs are spending more time lying to us than telling us the truth anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maggie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:40:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14400125</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some AP news stories are from other sources that AP themselves have re-reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So my question is, will AP pay those sources $2.50 per word from now on?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Better yet....has AP compensated those other news sources for all the past stories they ripped off?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14397889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; They are the source of a lot of our news and a valuable journalistic asset..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AP is an asset.. for the federal government sure.. I read AP to see how the propaganda is shaping up and what's the Zionists next move, not to get real news..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a feeling this fee is not for you or me, but just to bleed more cash from legitimate news sources that might be using AP... kill the American dream, one industry at a time..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HandleTheTruth</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:27:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-14397169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The AP is not a "news" source, it is a Zionist propaganda organ. Why would anyone in their right mind want to pay to pass on someone else's propaganda?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:20:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13979772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK then A.P.   if you want to quote me for a story, You gotta pay me the SAME amount for my words.&lt;br&gt;Bob O.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob O'Lary</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:02:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13947607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And photographers. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phojo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:35:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13947327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Social media helps spread information faster and to more people, which is the point of a wired service like the AP."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The point of a wire service is to provide news/photos to it's clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phojo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:25:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13923967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Could the AP please report to the Dead Pool? Um, thanks. I cannot think of a more ignorant position that the AP could take. Lets be serious, they have the Web to thank for syndication of their content. They have been the beneficiary of the network effect time and time again. I cant wait to see the fall out. How long till we can add them to the Dead Pool?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps maybe the AP is scheming to build the "InterPipe", a crazy new tool with which they can traffic their content without it ever being seen by human eyes. Its the new revolution?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Minock</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:19:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13861058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There isn't any hard and fast rule about what constitutes fair use. But I also have to wonder: If I used information and a quote from an AP article and it was duly cited in the bibliography of my article or paper if I would still have to pay, seeing as I didn't have to pay to get the information in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they want money for their content, let them set up their own site using their own content and charging either per article or for membership to be able to read the articles. AND they would have to stop allowing newspapers to publish AP content because it would be too easy for someone to use the article somewhere else.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jody Pellerin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:22:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13857116</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is absurd stupidity and flies in the face of copyright fair use agreements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It also ignores the fact that snippets of articles produce link-backs to their pages, so in fact draws more traffic into their site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just more proof that Associated Press is an intelligence vacuum which should be avoided by all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rocky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:18:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13856758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this certainly impedes progress. business isn't just a direct sell of its goods but it's also about building rapport and value with your customers. profits are the result of that relationship and the AP took more than a few steps backward with this move.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bustedkeys</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:04:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13856708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this certainly impedes progress. business isn't just a direct sell of its goods but it's also about building rapport and value with your customers. profits are the result of that relationship and the AP took more than a few steps backward with this move.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bustedkeys</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:02:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13851455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever. I will just ignore any AP story if this plan flies. One can count on lots of other sources. It's the internet, stupid!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Träsel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:25:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13839510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that news sites get more traffic to their content by social media posting quotes and links to the original content, but it's not enough.  I support most of what traditional media decides to do so they can recoup some of the money they're losing from people/bloggers using their work unfairly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only problem I see in this is that it interferes with "fair use."  A better business model could be ad revenue sharing with partnered websites.  Or a social media site setting up a partnership with a monthly fee for using content.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zackery Moore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13837652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"traffic and attention" aren't going to pay the journalists for doing their job properly (and not copying other people's work). &lt;br&gt;see The Washpost's "Death of journalism (Gawker edition)"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clarafrenchy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:31:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13837589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"traffic and attention" aren't going to pay the journalists for doing their job properly (and not copying other people's work). &lt;br&gt;see The Washpost's "Death of journalism (Gawker edition)"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clarafrenchy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:30:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote 5 Words From the Associated Press? That&amp;#8217;ll Be $12.50</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/02/associated-press/#comment-13836639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right. Good luck with all that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tdhurst</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:06:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>