<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/project_retweet_the_end_of_rts_as_we_know_them/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-15079365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With the new RT system, what if say 10 people RT that particular tweet but the tweet itself was already at 135 characters? Will some names be missed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SimoneIcough</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14892067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pull down menu, probably&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrys</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:58:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14892029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If someone you've chosen to follow would re-tweet a "disturbing image" or "raunchy stuff" then it's probably time to reconsider following that person when you're bothered by those things.  You wouldn't be seeing those on your home stream except for the person you'd already chosen...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrys</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14891947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Right, and let us add them in the front so those following our alerts can see why we want them to see the retweeted item.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrys</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:50:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14882545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It might just be my lack of coffee, but none of this makes a whole lot of sense to me. I can see where they would want to try to streamline things, and somehow make it all look more professional, but it just seems a little unnecessary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So instead of 'Yourname' RT @Someone (possibly RT@SomeoneElse) [Tweet], there's just going to be 'Someone' [Tweet] and then a list of everyone that's retweeted the message under it? (I think I'm barely making sense myself). Putting aside for the moment that my example might be confusing, what's MORE confusing is that when the RT shows up, it's going to look like it came from someone else other than me; I mean, my userpic will still show, but someone else's username will be there?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And if people stick to typing RT @Someone, will it automatically convert it into the new format, or are they just going to let it alone?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it's time for some caffeine, yes? Either way, I'm going to miss you @ sign. D:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Everlook</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:47:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14870478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander Bickov</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14861576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is fairly easy to do with TweetDeck groups.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathy Gill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:13:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14861345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Cullen, you've just described how I RT with TweetDeck.  I don't use the web interface, so I don't have to copy-and-paste.  Implementing a "click to RT" feature on the web interface is separate from the other (more complex) portions of this announcement. I'm pretty sure no one is complaining about having a "one click" RT from the web. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathy Gill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14861143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interested to see how this all pans out!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">miataylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:59:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14846549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure. It makes sense. With the new homepage, Twitter's repositioning itself as the place to go to find out about important news &amp;amp; trends. So they're formalizing the RT convention to use it in a voting algorithm. The more something gets RT'ed, the more "important" it must be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lawrence Wang</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:14:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14838379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+4&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">siamshopmarket</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:19:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14835300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because "copy/paste" is SOOO 2008. Just keep it the way it is. If twitter on the Web changes, will that mess with everyone's phone apps as well? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">annaomgz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14834002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't like it, can't add comments like you said. I won't use it if it becomes this,I'll still use RT:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Robinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:32:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14827434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The best thing Twitter could do is create a Favorite Followers filter in the sidebar. I have about 1500 followers but I really only want to timeline 1% of my followers. I'm in the process of unfollowing all but my favorite 1%. Also I retweet to add a comment- without that what good is it except for the lame attempt to get more followers and Google juice?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">colinfitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:07:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14826988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I implemented and launched the exact same idea exactly 1 month ago (see retweet/reply screenshot):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.x2line.com/al/archive/2009/07/12/3679.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.x2line.com/al/archive/2009/07/12/3679.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.x2line.com/al/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;on my twitter client (&lt;a href="http://fosimo.tr" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="fosimo.tr"&gt;fosimo.tr&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anatoly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:34:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14825917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there's a 'conversation' thing in twitter search&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">what</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14825910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like where Twitter is going with this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">josephgelb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:15:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14825686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good covering on this issue. I'm curious about the length of the retweets. Sometimes I &lt;br&gt;have to shorten someone's sentence in order to write 'RT @username' (and maybe a short &lt;br&gt;conment) in my retweet. This has to fit in 140 characters. I always shorten it in a &lt;br&gt;respectful way (for example changing 'one' into '1' or changing 'indeed' into 'idd'). &lt;br&gt;Will the integrated RT service shorten the original writer's tweet in a less respectful &lt;br&gt;way (i.e. just chopping text off after the 140th characters)? Those services that allow &lt;br&gt;you to use 140+ characters are not so, well, populair with me and my tweeps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks! :-)&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@jojanneke&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jojanneke v.d. Bosch</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:55:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14825607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What happens to the comments I add before retweeting something? Sometimes its only relevant to my followers with that comment attached..!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">geezi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:48:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14825501</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"They're making things more complicated than they need to be. RTs are fine the way they are."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With respect, but the new RT will be 1) Hover over Tweet. 2) Click "Retweet". 3) Confirm. Compare that to the original (and current) way of RTing 1) Copy Tweet. 2) Type "RT @username" Paste Tweet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's face it if Twitter had built this new system from the start and then suggested removing it and replacing it with the current way of doing things the resulting mashable article would have way more comments than this one and all of them would be negative.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cullen Henshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:38:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14825478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the new benefits from this approach are great, but not at the expense of the features your mention (adding commentary and losing clear visibility on who retweeted).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glenn Gillen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14825264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;makes sense. RTing now is sometimes quite painful&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">themashazine</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:17:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14824174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do NOT want the new Retweet format.  :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bujio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14823680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;+1&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathy Gill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:20:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Project Retweet: The End of RTs as We Know Them?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/13/project-retweet-analysis/#comment-14823662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very good point, ChrisDavid42. Related to ilishe's point that the person who RTs is important to most folks, not the original author.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kathy Gill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>