<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/oneok_sues_twitter_for_trademark_infringement/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:06:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-25653315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In my opinion, Twitter is enough to squeeze more money from business and celebrities, and then click on one of the blogs, Joe focused, to add to your profile.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dorothysur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16962085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Idiots&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thedp</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:32:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16861966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yet another company with trigger happy lawyers who feel they have to justify their paychecks. Couldn't they just ask Twitter to suspend that account - before filing the lawsuit?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elad Kehat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:08:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16818785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;fundamentally networks social are forced to have users do more next year to true to allow the use of marks in the niks records do not believe?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JMRL</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:23:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16817268</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the adverts don't interfere with Joe Blogs tweets and are related to the actual persons subject content then fine - just like GMail does i.e. discreet advertising at the top of your mail. There's no need to get into lecturing on hosting costs etc...there's a fine line between monetisation and user experience Hugh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, from a business model perspective, [my opinion] Twitter are more likely to squeeze out more cash from companies and celebrities rather then Joe Blogs clicking on a targeted add within their profile. Period.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Grech</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:51:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16815922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why should it be free of advertising? It's free. Do you seriously believe that you should have some kind of right to use a free service but expect it to be paid for by someone else? Do you have any clue what it costs to run a site like Twitter? Their employees aren't volunteers and no one is giving them gratis bandwidth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you use a service you should either pay for it or put up with a little advertising. Period.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles LeRette</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16807548</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stan - Thanks for staying on top of this.  This is a prime example of how presenting legal action can be sufficient in order to protect your reputation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karasma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:43:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16807117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a waste of time, suing Twitter when a simple email to the company would have solved the matter and kept everyone’s blood pressure down. Talk about overreacting, but I suppose in Oneokland, this is normal behaviour. Most people in most civilized countries would sort the matter out like adults.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Yan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16805641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately a company has a legal obligation to be seen to defend its trademarks otherwise they will lose them - so I'm sure OneOK(TM) know this is a pointless waste of time but they have no choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Keaty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16805368</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Srsly?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">YOU∆REON▼ISU∆L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16805228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't imagine this succeeding, the implications are massive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do wonder about the companies that do this, or is it just the layers earning a few $$ for themselves?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xposure</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:57:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16805158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How does Twitter decide who a well known individual (or site) is? I've got more followers than at least one verified account... But maybe since I don't tweet/blog exclusively about Web 2.0, I'm locked out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Z</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16805087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OneOk should have sued the ones that made the accounts and not Twitter. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonha Revesencio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:47:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oneok Sues Twitter For Trademark Infringement [Update: Dropped]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/17/oneok-sues-twitter/#comment-16805030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Twitter has other plans when it comes to business accounts" - this is one of the key areas they need to monetise and fast.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twitter is becoming or has become a great marketing tool. Keep it free / free of advertising for the general public but charge companies and celebrities to use it - Simple!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Re: Oneok suing Twitter - just shows that this company doesn't get/understand the open nature of social media - numpties...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Grech</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:44:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>