<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/is_social_media_making_corporate_websites_irrelevant/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:47:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10705843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Social Media is taking over the world, websites are becoming obsolete&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.whywebpr.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.whywebpr.blogspot.com"&gt;www.whywebpr.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.whywebpr.com/alimagnano" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.whywebpr.com/alimagnano"&gt;Ali Magnano&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richter10.2 Media </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:47:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10620289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam, your post spurred a great conversation around our office water cooler. I turned some of those comments into a blog post as a rebuttal to the notion social media will replace the corporate Web site. You can visit our company site to read the post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laurie Dunlop</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:57:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10620118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam, your post provioked a great discussion in our office. I turned team comments into a blog post rebuttal to the notion that social media will replace the corporate Web site. Thanks for spurring such a great conversation around our water cooler! Here is a link to my post, &lt;a href="http://www.netstrategies.com/blog/uncategorized/2009/06/do-you-agree-social-media-will-usurp-the-corporate-web-site" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.netstrategies.com/blog/uncategorized/2009/06/do-you-agree-social-media-will-usurp-the-corporate-web-site"&gt;http://www.netstrategies.co...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laurie Dunlop</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:52:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10523549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can anyone tell me why corporate websites are so afraid of social interaction on their sites. Doesn't the benefit outweigh the risk as long as it's managed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10373832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would tend to agree with Rebecca that one hand washes the other when it comes to social profiles and corporate sites.  As the story suggests not everyone is on board yet-with social media.   Plus, to further reinforce the statement that they are not mutually exclusive a growing trend that I have noticed is the happy medium that is the corporate site with social media elements.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Benin (@BeninB)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:55:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10328931</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam, excellent analysis. From a different angle, I've been wondering the same thing (about college websites) and wrote about it on my blog at &lt;a href="http://buildingmarketingstrategies.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/your-website-as-social-media/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://buildingmarketingstrategies.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/your-website-as-social-media/"&gt;http://buildingmarketingstr...&lt;/a&gt;.  I think the foundational thoughts are the same: why people go to corporate websites and their frame of mind when they do vs. why they go to social media, and how that prepares them for the exposure to your product. Thanks for the post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Hardy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:06:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10321165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes I agree&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lidadiyetzayiflamar10seooglelidaal.co.cc/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="lida diyet zayıflama r10seoogle"&gt;lida diyet zayıflama r10seoogle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lidaal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10318432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly, you're irrelevant as a commentator to even suggest corporate websites are redundant. I think there's a colony in French Guyana for you Kool-Aid drinkers...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:28:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10314788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;better than swallowing pills &lt;br&gt;Believe it or not, over 40% of the population cannot swallow a pill!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DYNA-TABS® - vitamin and herbal dietary supplements in fast-dissolving, great tasting, fun to take convenient strips are the ideal products for the 40% of the population who cannot swallow pills .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The line features varieties of innovative products including GINSENG WITH VITAMINS B6 &amp;amp; B12 ENERGY SUPPORT™, GREEN TEA ANTIOXIDANT SUPPORT™, HOODIA GORDONII CRAVINGS RESIST™, VITAMIN C IMMUNE HEALTH SUPPORT™, BROMELAIN AND PAPAIN DIGESTIVE ASSIST™ (an Antacid Alternative), WHITE KIDNEY BEAN CARB RESIST™, GINKGO BILOBA MEMORY SUPPORT™, ALOE VERA DIGESTIVE SUPPORT™ (Detox and mild Laxative) that are formulated in a variety of tropical and traditional great tasting flavors that dissolve quickly on the tongue so you do not need any water.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Its natural approach achieves its goal without any drug or chemical side-effects.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Taking just one flavored strip provides all the energy and medicinal nutriment you need without any of the carbs, calories, or sugar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To those who cannot swallow pills, which is a significant 40% of the population, and in fact, even those who can swallow pills prefer the strip format since it is faster to get into your system and convenient to take. Mintel, Datamonitor, and Nielsen reports that the strips format will soon replace the obsolete pill or bitter tasting liquid format thus giving you ground floor profitable opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Supplements are meant to be taken for preventive measures to support long-term good health rather than to treat diseases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the FDA testing, the average absorption level from a 500mg weight pill yielded only 0.002mg absorption and that is negligible. The conclusion is that the pill has a smaller dosage yield due to less absorption. They also stated these figures are average since each person has a different absorption metabolism level so for others it may be even less.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The absorption level of the Dyna – Tab strip is 100%. The strips dissolve on your tongue resulting in greater content absorption into the body that is easier and faster than pills, chewables, or liquids.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Normally, it takes 6-8 hours to digest pills, chewables, or liquids.&lt;br&gt;Furthermore, there is digestive process interference that causes changes in the ingredients, most of whose contents are excremented from the body in the usual 6-8 hour residual outtake manner - yielding very little product benefits. Pills, chewables, or liquids would need to be taken earlier on but then when would you know when to start taking it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The rise of strips being used in cough and cold, digestive, heart attach victims receiving nitroglycerine and now the inclusion and antibiotics in strip format thereby antiquated the pill format. The pill format requires 6-8 hours to digest yielding less than 0.02mg whereas the strips dissolve promptly through the tongue directly into the blood stream with full efficacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DYNA-TABS® strips contain smaller but fuller accurate content, good stability, less digestive processing interference, resulting in a faster, but fuller absorption effect that is sustained and controlled comparably to release drugs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusively, DYNA-TABS® strips having faster absorption results, are easy to take, convenient since they occupy minimal space in pockets or bags (instead of bulky and rattling bottles), packaged more sterile, and tamper proof yet easy to open which is important for the elderly or the dyslexic and satisfy a large target market niche.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you visit our website &lt;a href="http://www.dynatabs.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.dynatabs.com"&gt;www.dynatabs.com&lt;/a&gt;, you can see the major retailers who are successfully selling our products in their stores and benefiting from our publicity campaign.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;See the endorsements appearing in many magazine among the many others who have written favorably about us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;See our TV ad: &lt;a href="http://www.dynatabstv.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dynatabstv.com/"&gt;http://www.dynatabstv.com/&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HAROLD</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:50:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10278108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vitaminwater probably saved a lot of money on building a website that no one would go back to. The incremental benefit of the newsfeed is very useful (at least for now).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But "number of fans" count is probably a misleading metric for evaluating a campaign.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, vitaminwater will be able to communicate with those people again for some time but if they don't have anything useful to say it won't matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, once a few bad apple advertisers abuse the system users will simply learn to hide/ignore advertiser updates (if not opt-out of fandom).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noah Robinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:11:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10105640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just started a fanbook page for my business and it is amazing how these big companies are able to get such a large fan base.  Good for them!  You are a very detailed writer that offers a good read with useful information.  Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EcoWater AZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:26:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10049993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why why why, do people over sell what social media can do and its importance? For me, you cannot remove your corproate website, lets not be silly. By all means, leverage social media and social media websites, you really should as the benefits are there to see. Social media is there to help and bring a new form of communication, not to replace other forms of interaction!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Funny enough, was blogging about this only today&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://andrewonedegree.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/is-social-media-removing-the-need-for-corproate-websites/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://andrewonedegree.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/is-social-media-removing-the-need-for-corproate-websites/"&gt;http://andrewonedegree.word...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewonedegree</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-10045891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On the one hand, we keep reading how content is so important because good use of content that ads value to people helps build engagement, trust, and loyalty. Now, we keep reading about how noone remembers corporate websites or sites in general. So, what is it? Scrap corporate websites/sites and use twitter and facebook? Similarly, there is this confusion it seems about whether sites should be branded or not if they are not the corporate websites. Don't brand the site, people say this brand can't be trusted; brand the site and people say enough with the selling. Do we really know what we want?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rena Khawly Stuart</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:43:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9978941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, websites are still revelant. But corporate websites should integrate more social media functions to stay relevant: &lt;a href="http://cli.gs/DhYjnW" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://cli.gs/DhYjnW"&gt;http://cli.gs/DhYjnW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz Hover</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:35:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9973560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For corporations with many products and services there is a need to aggregate the overall corporate information and interactive tools. Additionally with Social Media tools like Facebook not charging and controlling almost all of your content, placing your entire business in their hands would be dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You need a strategy and a plan not just this thing or that thing. Make everything work together and then you get success. Rarely is it only 1 thing or the other. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ireckon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9961237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good call, Jen.  However, social media can be a waste if not properly implemented.  The right people + the right social venue + the right message = results.  If you miss parts of the equation, some marketing efforts can be wasted...even along the same lines as a banner ad.  I completely agree with your thoughts as long as the company understands how to leverage social media and how their social strategy compliments their marketing strategy overall.  Good insight though, thanks!&lt;br&gt;-Aaron&lt;br&gt;@aaronellsworth&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Ellsworth</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9961083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's going to be crazy if Lebron and/or Kobe don't make the championship.  Regardless, Vitamin Water got the bang for the buck.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the topic at hand, what do you think about having CEO's being the face of the company?  For example, our CEO tweets under &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/jobing" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/jobing"&gt;http://twitter.com/jobing&lt;/a&gt;.  He was formerly tweeting under his full name. This could give people an additional reason to do business with a company...right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett Farmiloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:24:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9960445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes! In part because numerous corporate websites languish for months - even years - with no informational updates even though personnel, roles, etc may have changed. In fact, I go one step further in arguing that sites like Twitter are the new customer service window for companies. I blogged about my view here: &lt;a href="http://www.gdc-co.com/blog/?p=89" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.gdc-co.com/blog/?p=89"&gt;http://www.gdc-co.com/blog/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marcie Casas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:06:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9959590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to respectfully disagree with the sentiments above and below.  VitaminWater still has a website - it's &lt;a href="http://www.glaceau.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.glaceau.com/"&gt;http://www.glaceau.com/&lt;/a&gt; and ultimately is leveraging Facebook's demographic to push their brand (among a specific demo), engage FB users, etc.  Go where your audience or demographic that you're targeting is.  How is this any different?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Weiss</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9958375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This raises the question, why not work towards making your website compelling enough for people to want to come back for a visit?  And incorporate email and social media campaigns to draw attention back to your website.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cindy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:13:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9958043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is total crap!  You are drinking and drowning in the Kool Aid (with or w/o vitamins).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">noteasilyfooled</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:04:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9957702</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam, you're hitting on what some of us in the digital marketing space have been murmuring about for a while....I would agree with @Rebecca that they are not mutually exclusive, but digital marketing does need to rethink what a brand digital presence is. Its not necessarily a hub and spoke presence where there is a dot com at the center and ancillary presence (Facebook, Twitter) at the edge....rather, a brand's digital presence will increasingly look more like a peered network or ecosystem where nodes have more equally weighted purpose (i.e. the dot com not necessarily the epicenter).....it requires what could be termed a "network architecture" approach to developing a digital presence...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alisa leonard-hansen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:54:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9957462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that's not what I say ... I wrote "users will need to be members in order to fully participate in your Page."  Yes, you can still view stuff, but if you want to vote in polls, become a fan, share w/ friends, etc. you need to be a logged in member.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:48:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9955824</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The downside is that some marketing dollars are clearly wasted – not everyone uses Facebook,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, marketing dollars are not wasted....wasted would be a banner ad campaign or a billboard that hits a traditional demographic that has existed for the last 100 years instead of who will actually buy their product.&lt;br&gt;The beauty of Social Media...all opt in.  Aka: your biggest fans ARE your marketing department.&lt;br&gt;-jen&lt;br&gt;@jenharris09&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jen Harris</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:57:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Media Making Corporate Websites Irrelevant?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/25/vitamin-water-kobe-vs-lebron/#comment-9952300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. I made a similar argument a few weeks ago, "Will Facebook (All But) Replace Corporate Websites", though my focus was primarily nonprofits:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/04/will-facebook-all-but-replace.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/04/will-facebook-all-but-replace.html"&gt;http://broadcast.oreilly.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Kelley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:36:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>