<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/is_posterous_the_new_twitpic/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:57:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10129983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Posterous is a great service! I've set up my own account to use for photos from my Blackberry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rockmenace</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:57:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10108085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is this about Twitter on TV? Are they really trying to take Twitter and put it onto the small screen? I guess I just don't understand how you would take twitter and put it on TV in the first place. Here's where I heard about it. &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/twee_vee_twitter_gets_down_to_business" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/twee_vee_twitter_gets_down_to_business"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zeq2m9</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:51:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10099686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If Posterous isn't supported by TwitterBerry, it's missing a huge opportunity.  Big misstep on their part.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dana</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:55:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10054790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget - twitterific is also for iTouch!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tallfreak</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10054401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I declare that I am the founder of TwitSnaps - I fell the jury is still out on which service is better in the Twitter Photo Sharing Space. We at TwitSnaps are foccussed on thought leadership and each and every feature in TwitSnaps is photographers delight :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simarprit Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:05:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10054218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;http//&lt;a href="http://www.coderanger.com/twitcher/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.coderanger.com/twitcher/"&gt;www.coderanger.com/twitcher/&lt;/a&gt; has supported Posterous since it was created, along with tweetphoto, yfrog, twitpic, pikchur and twitgoo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Petitt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:59:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10053957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's another photo share application that is climbing up the charts- TwitSnaps (&lt;a href="http://twitsnaps.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitsnaps.com"&gt;http://twitsnaps.com&lt;/a&gt;) You gotta look at the traffic that this site gets 2 weeks into the "soft" launch. The functionality that TwitSnaps provides is also much greater than the leader. Check this comparison out- &lt;a href="http://uurl.in/v43dt3" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://uurl.in/v43dt3"&gt;http://uurl.in/v43dt3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">K N Ajit Narayan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10051938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also think Posterous is an excellent option for posting image galleries online, very simple and straightforward. You should also include Orsiso (&lt;a href="http://www.orsiso.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.orsiso.com"&gt;www.orsiso.com&lt;/a&gt;) to this list of Twitter clients. It has all the key features and in addition helps organize all my other networks from one place. I prefer using that to any of the apps listed above, since my life isn't just about Twitter....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alastair McAlpine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10050340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Posterous rocks!&lt;br&gt;I love how it works well with everything.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am starting a new blog for a large organization, and Posterous is really going to make it easy to have a lot of contributors and have them use their preferred social media accounts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I haven't even scratched the surface of the capabilities and am very excited about it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10047571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the kind words, Andrei! We do support a real domain name, actually -- check out mine at &lt;a href="http://axonflux.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://axonflux.com"&gt;http://axonflux.com&lt;/a&gt; -- just set it up by clicking Manage &amp;gt; Site Settings!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garry Tan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10047482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Posterous in indeed one of the greatest start-ups available on the web today. They didn't forget the KISS strategy when implementing their service. I feel there is some kind of similarity between them and Evernote actually. Really good start-up! :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So good that instead of my portfolio page (I am a Flash Developer and CEO at Vuzum) I use a posterous page. Try it: &lt;a href="http://www.andreipotorac.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.andreipotorac.com"&gt;www.andreipotorac.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be nice if they would allow us to use a real domain name instead of &lt;a href="http://somename.posterous.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="somename.posterous.com"&gt;somename.posterous.com&lt;/a&gt; :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrei Potorac</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:11:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10047474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Photo sharing being so popular among twitter users, will there not be an integration sooner or later?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free Stock Images</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 05:10:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10046934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is your opinion about Twitsnaps? &lt;a href="http://twitdom.com/twitsnaps/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitdom.com/twitsnaps/"&gt;http://twitdom.com/twitsnaps/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anuj Seth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 04:19:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10046318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another interesting option is Twitsnaps. They have bundled huge number of features, and one might even say that they are taking on not just Twitpic, but photo sharing sites like Flickr, Picasa, etc. I mean, options like zoom, watermarks, etc. are neat to have!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sanjay Mehta</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:22:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10046270</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still I find that uploading photos on Twitter is somewhat complicated.. not user-friendly? What do you say?&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lendingstream.co.uk/contest-nintendo.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.lendingstream.co.uk/contest-nintendo.html"&gt;http://www.lendingstream.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10046258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Still I find that uploading photos on Twitter is somewhat complicated.. not user-friendly? What do you say?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:16:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10046126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Creating a photo blog of your shared Twitter images, without sacrificing comments that can be posted as @replies or image analytics.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">techsupport</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:04:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10045993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too bad that - when posting from Twitterrific - only the tweeted picture is placed on Posterous and not the complete tweet (meaning: including text).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc Otten</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:51:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10045941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;posterous is awesome in so many ways. &lt;br&gt;for sharing pictures on twitter you should also check out &lt;a href="http://img.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://img.ly"&gt;http://img.ly&lt;/a&gt; (oAuth support!)&lt;br&gt;or check my full list of potential twitpic alternatives here: &lt;a href="http://assbach.posterous.com/potential-twitpic-alternatives" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://assbach.posterous.com/potential-twitpic-alternatives"&gt;http://assbach.posterous.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">assbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:46:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10045924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try &lt;a href="http://twicli.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twicli.com"&gt;http://twicli.com&lt;/a&gt; - much nicer&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BasilBrush</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:45:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10045207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;cool pic&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blogger Rise</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:05:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10045094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I absolutely love the Posterous service as a way to share across all social media. Their robust API also opens the door for all sorts of applications to be built on top of their personal publishing platform.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garlin Gilchrist II</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10044904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes that's true. Its might be N60.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kitchenaid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:47:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Posterous the New TwitPic?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/26/posterous-twitter/#comment-10044705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think for Nokia, it should be S60, not N60.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amir Karimuddin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>