-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/08/12/google-reader-send-to/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
7 hours ago · 99 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
3 hours ago · 15 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
7 hours ago · 29 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
8 hours ago · 31 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
6 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
So same here if we we will move forward according to GOOGLE strategies, so definitely GOOGLE will gives us happiness, wealth ( with new api, tools, etc.)
http:/www.dreamweddings.co.in
-----------
http://freenintendowiipoints.com
What you really want is a feed reader that uses a ranking system that filters out all the junk. Retweets are a good measure of quality , number of comments, diggs.. why not use that information to help make readers' life easier?
Well, that's why tFeeder is there. If you're into technology news, tFeeder will save you TONS of time spent on looking for interesting items in your feed reader. It also has a very simple mobile version, so never before was doing a number 2 such a fruitful waste of time!!
http://tfeeder.com
Man... so many spammers on Mashable lately!
If they're gonna try to play this game, why do it all half-assed? Why not do it right the first time and set it so you can pick which services you want your "Shared" items to auto-publish to?
Me? I'll just leave Friendfeed hooked up to my shared items so I can click once (on Share) and not have to worry about it.
Now, for my friends following on GReader, they can browse everything I've shared whenever they feel like it. They're not forced to sort through it all on Twitter and/or Facebook. And for friends not following on GReader, but are on Twitter/Facebook, if I find something of particular interest, I can hit a quick link to share it on Twitter (which will also share it on Facebook).
It's discretionary sharing, and IMO that's better than the fire hose method other places utilize. I was having FriendFeed share my GReader shares, but I kept having to self-moderate what I would actively share. Now I can just uncheck having FF share GReader to Twitter automatically, and go back to the way I was sharing before (which often included inane things like Failblog and LOLcats that don't need to be clogging my Twitter/Facebook updates).
And 2nd of all, good point. I suppose it offers more control, but that's just a matter of personal preference. I only share the ones that are really good, or that I find really interesting and want to see in my Twitter stream. You on the other hand seem to be sharing for other reasons, and I didn't think of that.
Question though, if you're sharing but don't want it shared, then why are you sharing it? What's the point? Isn't that what the "Like" option is for?
If you use Instapaper, check out my quick explaination of it: http://www.willw.net/adding-send-to-instapaper-...
http://thingelstad.com/using-google-reader-send...
Come to think of it, given that I use Reader daily, the only reason I would need the new Mark All As Read options would be if my feeds included friends tweets and/or Facebook updates.
Anyway, remember you read it here first :-)