-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/07/07/google-chrome-operating-system/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
151 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
152 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
13 hours ago · 112 comments
-
MySpace Shuts Down imeem and Its App Community
2 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Redbox: The Enemy of the Entertainment Industry? [STUDY]
5 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
9 hours ago · 24 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
13 hours ago · 32 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
Google are simply going to release a stripped down Linux OS and badge it Chrome.
Google want lots of people (aka open source community) to help them Googlise it and then Google will say it’s something new and make millions of dollars off the back of ‘free’ work done by others.
Microsoft have a big announcement on Monday according to Scoble http://bit.ly/17qgzq and Google are trying to distract the market (after the past few months of coverage of BING) and try and pull back some of the volume and positive sentiment around Windows 7.
I would hardly be trying to beat the crap out of a non-announcement about an old is new again Linux OS but I guess blatant link baiting and traffic driving is the main game these days online.
Even if that's true, this is still huge as Google has trust built into its brand by so many users that it might truly push Linux onto mainstream users desktops. While I love Ubuntu, and have my mom rocking and rolling on Ubuntu (she emails and browses the web, nothing else, it works and I don't have to clean up viruses) many people are still scared of Linux.
But if it comes from Google they might give it a shot, love the speed and security of it and finally ditch Windows (and more importantly Internet Explorer).
Hahaha, do you guys even know what an operating system is. This operating system will be just a linux distribution. I know you often sell your opinions as news, but at least try to know a bit about what you talk about ...
How exactly will this kill Windows any more than Linux has done so in the past 15 years?
That is the last thing it is. When people first heard Google was going to develop a browser they had this same sentiment. Firefox with a Google logo was common. I have no inside information or access but I can guarantee that the last thing this will be is Linux booting Chrome.
They could have launched that years ago. As everything Google does, it will be incredibly well thought out and some of the smartest technology you will ever use. They understand that they need to have working print drivers for the majority of printers, they understand video drivers will need to just work, they even know that people want Photoshop to run on it.
The area that they will be closed out is video games. Microsoft owns DirectX and OpenGL stacks. This doesn't effect business buyers, but does have a significant impact on sales. If Apple could run video games without booting a Virtual Machine or rebooting into Windows more people would buy Apples. It will be interesting to see how Google Approaches 3D.
OpenGL is an open standard.
However, I don't think it matters if Gaikai works as advertised. That runs games in the cloud and uses flash as a "Game Terminal Server Client". If Chrome OS supports flash then Gaikai could supply the games. Even better, limited devices like netbooks could run games that their hardware just doesn't support. The biggest problem is the need to have an internet connection.
Google is trying to pursue everything at the moment because they have no competition..Cant wait to see what the future has in store.
Because Google OS = web-apps. & Microsoft = real apps.
MS tries in vain to take it's "real-apps" from the desktop to the web, while Google is already there, no need to go backwards and stifle their web-apps by fixing them to the desktop, Google OS will be web-based, reliant on the internet and all data should sit on a remote server, along with the apps.. keeping the local PC clean and quick and secure.
u download the plugin
look at google earth
real app, and now web plugin
And then everyone will hate them for having a larger market share than Linux and Apple's OS.
No, Linux isn't underneath OSX - what lies beneath OSX is BSD running on top of a Mach microkernel. OS/X's closest living relative is FreeBSD. They're (for the most part) unrelated to Linux.
Mind you, I would love an OS that actually boots up quickly. I get fed up of waiting 3 or 4 minutes for Windows to load!! ;)
Um, no. It's for netbooks... Did you actually *read* Google's announcement?
http://tinyurl.com/mkt6lv
What happened, Mashable? You used to be cool...
When was the last time you did something for people of this planet for no money????
Linux is what make the Internet happen, if it wasn't for Linux and the open source community you would not be seeing this website that runs on Apache (Open Source) and 99.9% chance it running on Linux. Don't forget about your DVD play and your MP3 players and any other embedded cheap equipment, 99.9% of them run Linux.
So my advice to you is stop bitching about Linux and learn to use it, if you don't one day you will be left behind. Because one thing is for sure, Linux no matter what happens is not going away. In this time of uncertainty with climate change, when the s**t hits the fan, its going to be the open source community with there free software and tools and there model of free thinking that will win the day.
My tip for you is find a Linux Distribution that suites the job at hand. Desktop - Mandriva or Ubuntu (But Ubuntu is still very young), Server - Fedora CentOS, Debian. They are all free and most have Live CD's so you can test them. But take my word for it, you wont learn until you install it as your primary environment. So free your self
e.g. graphics card
Do you know what t will be the size
I like it! I'm a developer on Microsoft's technology, I hope Microsoft will win!
Much like the Chrome browser is not heading for significant market share despite blogosphere initial excitement, there's no motivation for consumers to switch to a google light OS. I heard it said that Google's idea of customer service is "go f&^k yourself and here's a discussion board". That wont work with Joe-consumer who cant get drivers for his new Googlebook for his Lexmark printer and Epson scanner. From a branding persepctive, there isnt an available niche - the 'user experience' contender is Apple, thank you very much, and the 'price' + 'Geek' contender is Ubonto. but the resources and management attention required here may be a distraction from Google's core challenges of serving advertisers and agencies and protecting Google Search.
MicroSoft has its empire. There are a lot of companies living on it. They won't let Windows die, at least they won't let it be killed easily.
However, Google seems to usually release lightweight products. Sometimes they're so lightweight that they even shoot themselves in the foot. I mean, look at how much Chrome is still missing. If they were to release an OS, I somehow doubt it would be much more than a tablet PC type OS. I can't see it doing anything heavy. Maybe it would run Google Docs, but somehow that's just not that appealing. Not unless they really upgrade it to be compatible with other word processors. The last time I tried importing my resume to Google Docs the formatting was so screwed up I just deleted it.
Anyways, I'm anxious to see how this turns out. Google handphones... Google computers... Google internet...
no its clearly not! windows vista is not a netbook os! those are two different things. Applications designed for chromeos will also run in oter browser, but only in browser, this means you will be able to use those chromeos applications on vista, but vista apps wont work for sure in your chromeos. google doesnt want to beat microsoft with their chromeos, they just want to create a good netbbok os, thats all. I wish google would announce a new OS that would run on desktops and that could compeet with vista or windows7, but for that we probably have to wait a little bit more ;)
http://www.webhush.com/google-operating-system-...
MS moving into the Search market
Google moving into the OS market
It would be really interesting to see how things pan out
If Microsoft was going to be dethroned as king, than it would have happened with Linux. Its been on the market for years and doesn't cost a dime. Unfortunately, it doesn't have the developer backing either. So Google's Chrome OS might do well in some circles and will help with some of your basic online living but its not a replacement for the desktop or even a full-featured laptop.
Interesting point to note - Google says "Google Chrome OS will initially be targeted at netbooks".Trend research agency Trendsspotting recently provide evidences of "declining Android hype" & highlighted that android (read Goggles linux OS) will any become productive via netbook growth.
So the question is - isn't Chrome OS project much of relaunching 'Andorid' in that case?
http://www.trendsspotting.com/blog/?p=1315
1. 2 words: Corporate America.
2. HUGE base of installed systems AND TRAINED SUPPORT STAFF. (it doesn't matter if the OS is crap as long as there is support, and I mean BUSINESS SUPPORT in house.)
3. Schools use Windows.
Any arguments to the above realities are just wishful thinking.
I imagine the Chrome OS will be something very similar to Presto, the instant on web OS. I have Presto on my netbook, and while it is great for surfing the net, it's worthless for just about everything else. What you guys are completely ignoring in your Google fan-boyism is the fact that there are different OSs for different purposes. Not everyone is going to want a glorified web browser as their operating system. As a web designer, I certainly wouldn't. My suggestion is take a deep breath and curb your enthusiasm. Microsoft isn't going anywhere, and to suggest otherwise is not only a completely irrational leap of logic, it's ignoring the facts.
This OS is born dead. This is all marketing hype.
MS Windows is expensive (heavily do to the extreme levels of piracy that occurs worldwide, even in the US at least 20% of MS products are pirated, whereas in SE Asia 98% are <stats based on a piracy chart hanging in one of the MS buildings the last time I was there for a conference>)
A concern for developing countries with limited bandwidth would be, why would they want an OS that is heavily dependent on the Internet if the bandwidth is sketchy. Now, if the OS delivers native apps on the desktop using web technology (but not requiring a connection), that would definitely be useful and competitive. Problem is you have a large, entrenched populace, who can barely use a computer anyway who are use to Windows. Why would they change??? I work with everything, and will use this to bolster skills, but the average user is not going to change unless there is a really compelling issue to
By the way, Windows is expensive to buy off the shelf. Its sold to other companies and computer OEMS quite cheaply.
-Ethan
-Ethan
-Ethan
-Ethan
I do think that launching a web OS on top of Linux may be interesting. I like the Chrome Browser more than Firefox or IE as it is faster. For folks who just want to surf the web, check their email, modify Google docs, etc. This might be a lower cost alternative. For the power users, corporate user, road warriors, avid gamers, etc., I don't see it.
It definitely would be nice to gut Windows and remove all of the extras that folks may not need or use and have easier way to remove the crud that builds up over time (without buying software or going through a ton of dialog boxes to tuneup your system).
Anyway, I hope they are moderately successful though. Give me another viable platform to develop on (currently develop on Windows, Linux and Mac already as well as various phone platforms, etc.)
The only people excited about cloud computing seem to be IT writers who cherish the idea of accessing their data from any computer. But they can do that already. This cloud computing just makes no sense. But then again, when did sense have any place in the IT world?
share your views at http://www.ChromeOSchat.com Take Care!
Like firefox on browser, for me, ubuntu is very much preferable than any windows or mac or linux desktop.
If it is web based os, it will be perfectly suited for cybercafe business. lets see how it works in long time.
Not all the products launched by google are successful. But I love google's speed and simplicity. They think different way.
If windows 7 sucks more like vista, yes, either ubuntu or google chrome shall get big boost.
You can find the full transcript of an early 2007 interview in http://d5.allthingsd.com/20070531/d5-gates-jobs... and you can find a video of it in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5Z7eal4uXI
I’ve also posted only the part of this interview related to cloud computing here: http://my.opera.com/facildelembrar/blog/bill-ga...
But than again that's only for my windows computers...I wouldn't switch to Google OS over OS X Snow Leopard...Mac's are my computers of choice. But I think Google OS will be fantastic on a netbook! And if they (google) develops a stable OS that is fast and efficient and can run Office, third party apps and is device friendly, than I think it will take down Windows no sweat.
Why is it that you claim that they stole the idea, according to your presumption that the idea was stolen we can assume that you also think that Google Search is a stolen idea, the reason I say this is because there were internet spiders before Google.
Quote: A point for you to think.
email me the complete "comments" i made and i will reply to you. Because I don't remember exactly what you are referring to.
________________________________