<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/google_cant_be_gamed_at_least_not_by_meta_keywords/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:43:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-23638552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Get new backlink go to &lt;a href="http://mycoolbookmark.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://mycoolbookmark.com/"&gt;http://mycoolbookmark.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wrsler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:43:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17110440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've just spent ages tagging up a client's website!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the bright side it will now save some SEO effort.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17108314</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google is daily updating its algorithm and it makes sense with the current criteria of search results. These varying patterns for search results almost make difference in search ranking as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Used cars by owner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:54:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17083621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hate to say it, but well DAH......  this is old news.  Yahoo and Bing may still look at it though....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seowizzards</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17071881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is simply not true. Meta keywords have helped my sites for many years. And I added a few relevant meta keywords to a site and Google traffic is up 30 - 40 % after two weeks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andreas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:05:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17068520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While the META tags don't help you rank, they DO play a role with conversions and in getting people into your site.  Description tags for the SERP returned URL, especially in a highly competitive query, can greatly influence what SERP result the user clicks on.  The key is to test-test-test-test and test some more!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickmattern</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:19:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17067271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As the post said, most webmasters have known about this for years, however I almost always include a keywords tag, not for Google but for other search engines and there are many other sites/directories that crawl pages and actually use the keywords tag, so it's a good idea to include it for what it's worth...interesting video, thanks for posting!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MarketingTide</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17067117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, meta tags are a really cheap way to get traffic to your website. It's good that Google doesn't use them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Lalonde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17065102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;MMMMMMmmmm, yet most of the 'Gurus' are still telling 'newbies' about keywords, must use them etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foracnenomore.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.foracnenomore.com"&gt;http://www.foracnenomore.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jubo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17065055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As long as big sites like &lt;a href="http://Amazon.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Amazon.com"&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://Ebay.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Ebay.com"&gt;Ebay.com&lt;/a&gt; continue to use them, they still get my vote. And of course Google still uses them on their Analytics site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;meta name="keywords" content="web analytics,web statistics,counter,tracking"&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All together now!...You can't get better than a nice bit of Meta! La La La La Laaa!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary Taylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:48:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17064580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Young</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17063710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Crap! I actually put the entire contents of all my pages into the meta tags, hoping that would help things...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't believe I paid $50,000 for advice like that... I'll be firing my SEO guy now. :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Prodoehl</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:39:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17063209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel like the guy who has to constantly send his family links to Snopes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors"&gt;http://www.seomoz.org/artic...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17062952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good, meta tags aren't needed anymore. Content and links matter more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sendn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17062641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does this include the "meta description?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17062570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With a Google Pagerank of 2, you really have to be the best!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:12:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17052068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Descriptions I'm going to let you finish but keywords had one of the best SEO of all time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">complexity0</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:29:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17051500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Google stuff got pretty strict lately, I broke my ban record yesterday, getting ban in 3 hours after making my site live and got it indexed :(&lt;br&gt;20 fresh euros in vain ...  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Σχολή Χορού</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17050770</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally! This was known for  while after mysteriously dropping "keyword" optimized sites across about 7 months ago.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;URL and domains are more important than ever. Not to mention content =) Hoorrraay!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you Matt, I hope your cat is doing well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paola Wolowitz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:03:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17048720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He is a dumbSEOass , keywords are not for freaking google "ranking" , I experiment this on so many blogs/sites. The thing is that it puts your blog/site in the right category. If you write about fashion you can't put keywords like google, social networking, spam  :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Keywords are most likely used for adsense, adwords purposes from my own experience if blog/site had no keywords it took 20 minutes to update the adwords.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With keywords took 1 second.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@JoeHobot</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:19:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17048617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good to know... I was about to spend a few nights updating meta tags on our ecommerce site...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Roberts</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17048407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I kinda figured as much, with the proper algorithm the SE can figure out what your keywords should be. Plus the majority of sites I look at (both huge and small) have no metatags. The only reason a big company wouldn't include metatags for SEO is if they insignificant to SEO placement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ediciuz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17048281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I knew it, I knew it.  I guess I should stop keyword stuffing my meta tags. JK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I seem to only use the meta description as a sort of adwords ad.  With a call to action and phone number or something of the like.  This has been known for a while, you just never heard it straight from the source till now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brettburky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:10:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17047999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[&lt;a href="http://forums.graaam.com/104/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="رسائل جوال"&gt;رسائل جوال&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب"&gt;العاب&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://forums.graaam.com/49/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="صور "&gt;صور&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/c1-0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب بنات"&gt;العاب بنات&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/c13-0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب طبخ"&gt;العاب طبخ&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/c11-0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب سيارات"&gt;العاب سيارات&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/c5-0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب اكشن"&gt;العاب اكشن&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب فلاش"&gt;العاب فلاش&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://chat.graaam.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title=" شات "&gt;شات &lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="hguhf"&gt;hguhf&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/c12-0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب تلبيس"&gt;العاب تلبيس&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب باربي"&gt;العاب باربي&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://www.graaam.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="دردشه"&gt;دردشه&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/c20-0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب سونيك "&gt;العاب سونيك&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/c10-0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب ماريو "&gt;العاب ماريو&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://www.graaam.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="دردشة"&gt;دردشة&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/c19-0.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب كرة قدم"&gt;العاب كرة قدم&lt;/a&gt;][&lt;a href="http://games.graaam.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="العاب فلاش جديدة"&gt;العاب فلاش جديدة&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">graaam</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:03:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Can’t Be Gamed; At Least Not by Meta Keywords</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/google-meta-keywords/#comment-17047986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL...this is no change. Google claims to change it's algorithms, but I don't believe it. I haven't changed my website in months yet I continue to stay on top of the competition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacob Brown Designs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:03:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>