<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/google_caffeine_a_detailed_test_of_the_new_google/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:04:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-21845320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article, however am not looking forward to the "SEO professionals, your job just got a lot harder."....brilliant!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">markhincks</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-21772667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ben, Thank you for the analysis of Caffeine. I was curious about the differences but now I am clear.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse James</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:19:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-21751327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think Bing is only Good for searching images :D .. Nothing more then that. Google is still my first priority and hope so other also.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Facebook Applications</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:04:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-20920496</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well i Search it in new google and What i get that the are using old Data Center, Because i see That Results are coming From 7 days old SERP Ranking, Really, and what another thing i notice is that it index very less page of my sites, any how speed is very good, lets see what happen if they launch full version of Google "Caffeine"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:04:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-20796408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I notice you didn't comment about the accuracy of "competition" results. Google results vary widely, sometimes by several hundred thousand within a day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would appreciate it if you would&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stevewoodward</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-20720033</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SPAM&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">asdf</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-20638959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will we be able to run both caffeinated and decaffeinated versions of Google after Google caffeine is released?  Some people prefer decaf, although I've never understood them at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've always preferred the real thing, and decaf seemed like it was faking it.  I don't suppose you can have it both ways.  Decaf drinkers, get ready to give up your posturing and step up to the real thing !  Take your search like the professionals we always knew you could be ! No more decaf, good-bye and good riddance !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnlombaerde</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-20367557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't wait to see what this does to the seo industry.  Should be interesting to follow the ranks as they increase / decrease following this new update from Google.  I heard Bing has a similar update in the works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Taylor Reaume</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:00:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-20290713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree with the entire post, I searched few keywords myself and found Google caffeine more relevant and accurate with good speed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">games</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:22:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-19825149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like Bing quite a bit, but I don't know if its good enough to replace google for me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.obamabidenwhitehouse.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.obamabidenwhitehouse.net"&gt;www.obamabidenwhitehouse.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smk436</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:07:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-19658469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is not a very good news for an SEO professionals .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because a long time, we have been in accordance with the previous google search rules to optimize their own websites, time accumulated, and now we have very good rankings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I and my many friends say,the new search so that our rankings have dropped significantly. In the next time we need to google to learn the new rules. But in this period of time, our sales will surely decline. I do not know anybody's ranking in the new search was still good or have some improve?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While the new search is helpful to users,it's a new development and challenges for us, but if the emphasis is designed to deal with bing, and it's too ridiculous.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">live cams</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:53:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-18788139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Guys...see the link..&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.seobook.com/google-caffeine" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.seobook.com/google-caffeine"&gt;http://www.seobook.com/google-caffeine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now..its tough time for SEO Professionals.....&lt;br&gt;They says: Smaller chunks means faster SERP generation"&lt;br&gt;So now...all the search results are going to be local...&lt;br&gt;Break the thread now!!!&lt;br&gt;Try using google caffeine:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/"&gt;http://www2.sandbox.google....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;and experience the change!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Krishna Shekhar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-18785105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google Caffeine is in the testing phase (beta version)..taking feedback from users..&lt;br&gt;Will be launched in few months...say na....2 months...nearly...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Krishna Shekhar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:50:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-18462998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about the google sandbox for new websites?  Will this have any different treatment for newer sites?  I have to wonder, as my new sites takes a pounding in the new google but is treated like royalty by bing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">florida health insurance</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-18362914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bing, just like Yahoo, is only for English search.&lt;br&gt;For example, I'm Lithuanian, and searching for some popular keyword is much better on Google. Bing and Yahoo gives 4 of 10 top results English pages, which has only exchange link in the footer of the page and nothing else about that word.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marius</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-17727707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks good!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rascals</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:35:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-17693041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh boy, here we go again! We always do better with each Google dance, but it still makes me nervous each time we get a waltzing. Great post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cleaning business Suze</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:51:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-17213136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to know a bit more about how SEO should be done in order to rank higher with the new parameters...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">londonbusinesscards</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:18:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-17069624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please put Accuracy on 1st place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:52:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-16982344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the great review on Google Caffine....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I could care less about speed, well, if it took 5 minutes then I would but 2/10 of a second --aren't we getting a little impatient? Anyway, what I want is Relevancy. I don't want youtube when I’m searching for information on a natural herbal remedy. My main problem with Google is I have to wade through hundreds of sites to find what I'm looking for and most of the sites have the same information. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Weed out the duplicate content...I don't need 50 sites with the same information. What I do need is what I’m looking for without having to visit 20 sites to find the information. If I have to wait one full minute to get that information then I’m willing to wait that long. It takes longer to wade through the sites that aren’t relevant. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would prefer to have just one search engine but I find I need several when I’m doing research just to find the information I need. Perhaps a preference on what we want returned, (i.e. shopping, social networks, video, etc.) I know they have the “I’m feeling lucky” button but it doesn’t always work. I guess they can’t please everybody. Just my 2 cents. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SaraSmile&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">I am Sara Smile</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:40:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-16927851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the test results and detailed explanation. I wasn't sure what "Caffeine" was and finally decided to look it up (with good old Google!) and this was a perfect explanation. Looking forward to how this changes SEO, looks like I have a lot of work ahead of me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Porter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:04:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-16720708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this will be for sure one more great product from google&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">garvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-16705235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, I know I am a bit late in commenting, but I *heart* the drag to share functionality on this article.  Can you tell me more?  Thanks again for a great post&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kiki</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:26:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-16525078</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I have noticed is Giggle returns fewer sites for a keyword, and I think that is how they accomplish the faster returns for a search. I searched for one keyword that use to have 59 million sites returned, now its 24 million. So I hope they are clearing out the irrelevant sites and the duplicate url's and the ones that are 4 years old and dated useless sales pages!!!  Quite a tall order, I will still use Bing - I like the competition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">P Neisman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:44:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/08/10/google-caffeine/#comment-16520020</link><description>&lt;p&gt;very interesting discussion! i always wondered what is the real difference:)! thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">arty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>