<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/google8217s_new_layout_love_it_or_hate_it/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:39:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-13090569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i need the page size in my search results!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;it lets me know how much bloat is on a particular page.&lt;br&gt;why load a 300KB page for a cd listing when i could find the same info in a 30KB document?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;cmon google , give me some advanced settings where i can customize my results.&lt;br&gt;sort results by page size? hmmmm nice!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">compn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12245728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm, I think the margin makes the new layout cleaner.But  Google should include displaying the size of web pages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ishank badhani</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:19:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12244898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love it .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">led display</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:17:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12191204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the new layout, it's slight but effective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, we found that Google were running test adverts the saturday after it rolled out: &lt;a href="http://www.neooptic.com/blog/post/Googles-New-Layout-PPC-Ads-About-to-Change.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.neooptic.com/blog/post/Googles-New-Layout-PPC-Ads-About-to-Change.aspx"&gt;http://www.neooptic.com/blo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does this perhaps mean that the change is not just for speed and ease of use but to possibly also support a future change in the format of search adverts? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12179905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I prefer seeing the size of the document.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ash Nallawalla</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12179061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i find the new layout better, it see better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesanswer.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.yesanswer.com/"&gt;http://www.yesanswer.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12178983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think the new better, it seems to be alive&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12159147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like it a lot better; always hated the flush left margin. While it's sad to loose the page size indicator I really never looked at them anyway.  I do think the useless space below the logo and above the search results is, well, useless.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeSchinkel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:49:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12140794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did Google stop to consider that the reason people may be doing less searches is because they're finding the results on the first try more often, since there are more links to click from?  This wasn't about usability, it was about increasing the number of pageviews to increase their ad revenue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad F.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:45:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12138090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I miss the predicted size of the website being displayed near the link. It actually became handy for me when trying to find resources on a Dial-up connected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I have to guess lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Miria Reu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12087207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't like the fact that they no longer show the page size in kb.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Penny Grabber</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:20:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12076164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll just say that I don't think the left indentation is useless.&lt;br&gt;As someone who doesn't run their browser's fullscreen (I make it more like a page width) I hate it when things are bumped up all the way against the window border.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12076150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that's a good find :&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dyegov</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12076076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The new google layout for search results are so minor. I didn't even know anything had changed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">josiahstaggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:19:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate because of not showing page size ... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pROCKrammer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:10:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Much cleaner looking. Is there any indication this relates to Microsoft's Bing offering?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">macewan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:10:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;New google layout is simple and easy to use&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">axealis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That "useless spacing" helps increase readability and hierarchy on the page. The smaller logo also helps put the search results first, not branding. Also, the logo looks MUCH better with that extra space around it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for kb size - unless you're on dialup, that was useless, outdated clutter. I haven't checked my mobile to see if they kept kb on their mobile version, where it would make more sense.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think this is a positive improvement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, let's be frank, this is Google. They don't shift a pixel without research to back it up. Sometimes that's to a fault, but probably not in this case. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/10/business/10ping.html?_r=1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/10/business/10ping.html?_r=1"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 'useless spacing' diagram inspired me to comment. It's just an incredibly ignorant statement. It's called 'whitespace' and is as important as the content, if not moreso, visually.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:40:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a change but I might not have noticed at all if it wasn't pointed out to me. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:39:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a good bet the new margins aren't aesthetically driven. Real-time search, SearchWiki Notes or some other new feature is likely to popup in the margin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Calcote</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like old version :( &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shift</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It also has show options, new layout sucks and this is like week old news&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vygantas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:33:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12075074</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is meant by "aesthetics" here? The look and feel of the site are aesthetic concerns that go beyond merely surface-level appearance. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aimee Knight</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:27:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12074977</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't notice a change. For me, if a site can change without the user noticing it's a good thing. It may also be pointless if the user can't tell, but hey, at least the change wasn't bad :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gaby</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:23:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s New Layout: Love it or Hate It?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/03/googles-new-layout/#comment-12074966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That sucks :s.. (Removal of page size in kb)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paradox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:22:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>