Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

aparnabala4u — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:07:08 -0000

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/////

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

ericmarmar — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:34:19 -0000

just like Eric that's a number; but how user "live" in Facebook Mutch more .

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

eric — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:54:08 -0000

whoua so much!!!

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

eric — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:53:35 -0000

whoua so much!!!

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

eric — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:53:10 -0000

whoua so much!!!

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Cecilala — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:39:44 -0000

For someone who represents himself as a non-Internet bully, you certainly do a spectacular job of being a perfect example of what you claim not to be. You are, unequivocally, an Internet bully and have a deep-seated need for attention. Your claim to have found a random link is laughable; Scott's link is directly above your post, which hardly makes it random.

I didn't need to read three things about you before I concluded that you, sir, are the total douche. While Mr. Bradley's Facebook page may not live up to your profile-writing standards, his profile is not one which deserves such severe criticism. Where is your profile? You supplied no link for him to follow, just a set of directives which are supposed to snap him into producing a profile which fits your - uh - standards. Are you Kidding? I laugh at the thought! Please leave me a link to YOUR profile so I can offer the "service" you offered Mr. Bradley and leave a critique - for your benefit, of course. Why else would I choose to humiliate you in public? I don't know you, I haven't spent three minutes in conversation with you, but I feel that gives me every right to make you look like a moron in front of millions of people. Sound familiar and fair?

Now, see, I don't think there's anything wrong with Scott's interests. He says he likes to read and write blogs (which makes him at peace with most of the Internet nation), and you have the nerve to call him a sycophant who thinks too highly of himself. You know, it's funny - because that's exactly what I see in you. You have either had too many minions or you have been badly psychologically abused and are using those as excuses to take your frustrations out on other people, people you don't know and have no idea how they will be affected by the horror of your words. There's nothing wrong with the word "spirituality," either. He's not claiming to be a guru (you're doing that right here in River City); he's telling you he's interested in God in many different ways. There's nothing complicated about that, and, if you'd given yourself time to think about it, you may have realized the difference between spirituality and "it's complicated." There is absolutely no reason for him to "pick a religion." That isn't any of your or anyone else's business. Further, being on the Internet IS an activity - whether on Facebook or Fannybook - OR on Twitter, it's an activity and, if you are going to classify reading as an activity, then you would also have to allow reading ON THE INTERNET as an activity, not just reading a book which you can hold in your hands. That's just downright stoopid with to "Os."

Why is what Mr. Bradley does so important to you, anyway? Why do you want to know if he reads or plays an instrument (or sits in the middle of the street at high noon having a picnic with a baboon)? And what's with that "Do you work out?" question? Why do you want to know?

He has defined "helping people" in his own terms. If he ponders it he will see the dichotomy, so you may have served a purpose on that point; however, that's something you could have sent him in a private message, used kinder words (you know, as in "helping people?") though again, it's none of your business.

There are, most likely, millions of people walking about the planet who do not have favorite literary classics. Why is this so important? How does this make one a better person? Obviously, the two literary classics you claim to have read have done nothing for your character - after reading "Les Miserables" and "A Tale of Two Cities" (you did read them, right?), one would think you'd be more sympathetic and less critical to others, but those social messages seem to have been wasted on you.

You say: "I'm adding you to my bookmarks. I'll be interested to see if you ignore this as an Internet asshole or if you'll change it for the better. But I think you should, and maybe there'll be more on your wall than, y'know, you. I think you're a good person that means well, but is a little clueless on how to present it.

I also write this as someone who once had, and maybe even still has, some of the same arrogance that plagues your page. You seem like a good guy who wants people to know he's a good guy. Don't force it, let it happen. I'll be watching. Like a stalker.

Creepy."

... and I refer you to the following: http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

In summation, I will say I'm happy to know you're pleased with Mr. Bradley's choice of mentioning roller coasters in his profile. After all, who out there isn't looking for YOUR approval? And don't talk about douche bags unless yours is spotless. Also, I'm prompted to ask - who the hell do you think you are?

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Antoni Azis — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:56:28 -0000

all right...

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Michael's Info Blog — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:16:42 -0000

I got mine, but it's pretty unique: http://facebook.com/michael... :-)

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Dani386 — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:08:52 -0000

I was one of the lucky ones to get exactly what I wanted... :)

www.facebook.com/DanielleMi...

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Cary Ellis — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:31:19 -0000

I was suppose to get the usernames "healthy diet" or "healthy lifestyle" but they were taken immediately. I ended up with http://www.facebook.com/raw...

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

ellen stephenson — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:10:57 -0000

Got my new facwbook url in less time thanit took me to type this message

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

David — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:35:36 -0000

Wow! Those facebook usernames go fast! I tried at 9:00:01 sharp for davidward, even though it wasn't suggested. It turns out it wasn't suggested because it was already taken. So I went back and tried for david.ward since it was suggested to me ten seconds earlier. By that time it was also gone already. So I had to settle for davidearlward. It's a little long but at least it's my actual name and easy to speak.

Online, friends will get to your facebook through their Friends list or a hyperlink in an email (which could just as easily be the old-school URL) rather than typing in your username. The username is to make it easy to *vocally* tell someone how to find your facebook: i.e. "My facebook is at facebook.com/davidearlward." So it should be a username that would be easy to know what to write if someone spoke it to you.

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Khizar — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:10:08 -0000

http://facebook.com/khizarh...

I was online waiting for it and within a second my desired Username(khizar) was gone. At the end it was a waste to get up early just to signup username which i could have got after 3 hours of more sleep

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

APaul — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:55:48 -0000

Apparently both my entire name & first.last were taken... D***... So I went ahead for my twitter username--- facebook.com/apaulished

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Suzy Lynn Buchanon — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:13:51 -0000

I got my username..........it's sgbuchanon!!!! Yah~~~

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Suzy Buchanon — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:12:10 -0000

I got my username..........it's sgbuchanon!!!! Yah~~~

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

dwight — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:59:24 -0000

wanted misterT but got thedwight

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

dwight — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:58:11 -0000

wanted misterT but got thedwight

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Elizabeth @ Table for Five — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:53:04 -0000

http://www.facebook.com/eli...

It's such a common name, I was shocked that any combinations of it at all were still available this morning. Sure is a lot prettier than the old random bunch of numbers!

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

slac — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:37:19 -0000

i got mine :) http://incomm-vshare.net/slac

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Josh Fraser — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:50:20 -0000

http://www.facebook.com/jos...

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

nuriet — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:12:36 -0000

www.facebook.com/nuriet

I got the one I wanted :)

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

Guest — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:06:36 -0000

Someone already got facebook.com/ilovecock so I got my backup, facebook.com/randydillon

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

lidaal — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:45:07 -0000

got mine. thanks :)
fx15 lida yılan yağı karınca yumurtası xacc

Re: Facebook Usernames are LIVE: 200,000 Usernames in 3 Minutes

kasper — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:45:27 -0000

can.i.rape.you.anally
hahahahahaahahah