<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/facebook_to_open_your_status_updates_to_developers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:21:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-9744466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter rules!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beto Aveiga</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8924808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tell Me about it! This is a serious impediment to taking Facebook seriously. If I want silly games, I'll log into Myspace.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guruvan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 10:02:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8852401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I suppose it's a necessary part of the progression of Facebook.  To get developers to work in the most productive manner they will be gathering more personal data. Interesting how you mention Facebook's "privacy" may ultimately be its own demise against the more open twitter but if security risks plague one over the other, that may determine the last man standing.  &lt;a href="http://www.justaskgemalto.com/en/search/node/facebook" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.justaskgemalto.com/en/search/node/facebook"&gt;This*&lt;/a&gt; discusses the risks/etc. associated with social networks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:28:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8775384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Both platforms can exist in parallel. The majority of users already have problems figuring out the privacy settings of the current Facebook. Privacy on FB mishaps have already cost the jobs of a few politicians &lt;a href="http://ow.ly/4eWX" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ow.ly/4eWX"&gt;http://ow.ly/4eWX&lt;/a&gt;. Wait until they have to parse their data into public and private streams. It's gonna be messy folks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jaypiddy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8737407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twibes and hashtags for Facebook?  Update aggregators?  I wonder what MySpace has to say about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8729637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that the tides are beginning to turn within Facebook as more and more users begin to realize that the platform has privacy settings, and these privacy settings are powerful.  I've always said that Facebook could be an all-in-one site, with notes as blogs, info tabs as resumes, albums as portfolios, etc.  But most-importantly, authenticated networks.  No platform online offers users the ability to build &amp;amp; manage their identity in so many ways while micromanaging the their privacy.  It should be interesting to see how the 'face off' turns out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pablo </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:37:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8726241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand the 'need' to change for Facebook, I really am; but by 'opening' up users data to developers? Not too crazy about it. Despite permission granting is required, can't help feeling sceptic just how secure it is anymore afterwards. What if there are shared data with friends that we don't intend for it to go public, but our friends released without our consent? If it is going to happen, better make sure it's well planned, not until upsetting other users during the process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@wchingya&lt;br&gt;Social Media/Blogging&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wchingya</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:26:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8726240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sick of banning annoying applications. Hundreds of them at 7 clicks each. I don't care which Star Wars character somebody is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">click click click</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8720319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But I feel that Twitter is still better!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:59:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8720100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect this is why the share with "everyone" option is being so heavily touted.  It would offer a similar openness to Twitter.  I also would bet that they'd make this the default setting for status updates.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Sattel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8720041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is posing a big threat to Facebook and this is FB's response. Looking forward to seeing what types of implementations will be developed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Raj&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://highonhollywood.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://highonhollywood.com"&gt;http://highonhollywood.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8719602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Before Facebook does any more it should take care of it's terrible refresh rate. Many of the applications take much longer than expected to load and these minor annoyances could begin to drive people away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex S</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:55:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8719352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What worries me as I compare twitter to facebook? We do not post videos or photos of our families on twitter but, most of us do on facebook. Only our 140 characters or less gets "mashed up" as you say on twitter. Can you explain how they will mash up photos and videos? I am trying to make sense...of it all...I am sitting on a barbed wire fence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dr. La Vergne L.Thatch</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:37:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8718834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're absolutely right.  I don't care who does what with my Twitter updates, because they're not personal.  On the other hand, I don't want anyone outside of the people I've added to my contacts list being able to see what I post to Facebook.  It's a private, for friends only set-up, and I intend to keep it that way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One thing I thought of though is that most of the apps you use say it will pull your updates, your friends' updates, and your friends' info.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does that mean that anything you post that shows up on the homepage of someone that "checks yes" will also be added to the soup?  If that's the case, I may lose some contacts...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradleyf81</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8717808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They do this on Tweetdeck right now with no permissions. I think this is a bad idea. Facebook users like the perception of privacy. (Whether anything is truly private on the net is a subject for another discussion) However, unless they make the sharing VERY obvious, I think they will have very upset users. I mean why bother with adding friends to see your posts if they can be posted anywhere, by any app?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schachin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:08:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8716654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's about time!  Great move by Facebook, although I'm still not convinced they will ever be like Twitter.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Social Marketing Impact</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:06:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook To Open Your Status Updates to Developers</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/26/facebook-open-updates/#comment-8716402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;After seeing the headline I have to say that I didn't imagine the counter-point you raised. Very good point Pete. I'm looking forward to seeing the mashups and how many users will open this up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frederick Townes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:52:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>