Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Ellen — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:39:30 -0000

I've tried it and I think it's wonderful. It loads faster on my dinosaur of a computer and I don't have to deal with the unnecessary apps that people keep...

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

galuhsadewo — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:38:45 -0000

i like young girls

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

7-down — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:20:28 -0000

Facebook sucks, end of story.

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Shitij Nigam — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:51:35 -0000

Facebook has a knack of forcing people to adapt to whatever changes they make to their website - but this might be a bit too much. I mean, sure, Facebook is one of the most popular ways of sharing links, but the nature of these links might come into question (being more towards the 'fun' side, if you may, as its more of a private network) - thus rendering the search of specific information in a similar manner to Twitter slightly, well, pointless.

Wow that sounded a lot more cryptic than I intended.

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Shilo Urban — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:50 -0000

I thought that's what Twitter was for- for people who don't like dealing with the bullshit of Facebook. Right?

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Harun — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:56:55 -0000

aren't you guys a bit getting repetitive. you're covering the same story again and again.

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:35:59 -0000

Facebook Lite is the new Classic Coke.

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Matter3 — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:22:14 -0000

It's only the heavy data apps the bother me, other then that it's fine
---------------
http://freenintendowiipoint...

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Travis — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:09:43 -0000

You need to get more ram. lol

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Jennifer palmer — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:03:16 -0000

I wish this form were better with screen readers, but it isnt. so here we go. I hope this new version of facebook will improve accessibility for blind/visually impaired users. I have a computer with 256 mb of ram and it slows to a crawl on facebook, and whats with facebook not working right with firefox?

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Travis — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:56:35 -0000

Facebook should of never got to the point where it needed this Facebook Lite

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

macewan — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:50:57 -0000

Even today people complain about the new look. How long has it been? One - two months? Perhaps Facebook Lite should keep the that teenage twitter'ish look and the let the grown-ups get the old look back.

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Dr. Thomas Ho — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:38:18 -0000

Irrespective of Facebook's motivation for Facebook Lite, it's got to be a step in the right direction because Facebook is just too CONFUSING. That's why I've preferred Twitter!

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:26:13 -0000

So, what was the point of Facebook's "makeover" a few months ago? I reduced my time on Facebook once they added all of that crap. In fact, Facebook talked so much about changing their look to look like Twitter that I just switched to Twitter almost exclusively. I missed the streamlined original version of Facebook, and now Facebook is trying to go back to that?

Re: Facebook Lite: Facebook Needed a Diet

luiser — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:21:55 -0000

What actually makes Facebook heavy is the annoying applications.