<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/facebook_is_very_confused_about_breasts/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:55:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-15538866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know why some of women just want to show off for no reason.Sharon's case is an exceptional one.If a photo is there for some relevant reason then it's okay.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:55:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-12501123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This issue has grown big and I'm happy with the result, Facebook listened to the protesters. Breast feeding is totally not obscene.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Medela</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:35:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10706822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the mixup is nudity vs. pornography. There is a major difference between the two! I could never understand the fuss about women breast feeding in public places, it's a natural and healthy occurence. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:10:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10347361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In this case I'm seeing a challenge of cultural differences for Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a European (from the Netherlands) I understand the American response of Facebook. Some things, like pictures with tits or nipples seem to be considered 'not suitable' in the US, even when it's not in a sexual or pornographic context. Facebook might be American but since Facebook is being used across different cultures, it's hard to determine what the leading culture should be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dutch users would probably have allowed both the pictures and the video. Cultural difference; we never would have made a big deal about the nipplegate thing with Janet Jackson during the Super Bowl of February 2004.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting case; different rules on Facebook for different cultures? Or one leading culture with it's own values, derived from which culture?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10339261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;_ Blackwhiteconnect.c'om __ An exclusive online community designed to help diversely ethnic singles meet new friends, make great dates, and build lasting interracial relationships. Meet like minded singles who are looking to date outside their race. U can just check it out and decide whether u want in.Hope u can join this big family.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joycekane</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10335897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Facebook.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Facebook.com"&gt;Facebook.com&lt;/a&gt; is nice social network rightnow and also i've found a new social networking in the web it's &lt;a href="http://www.hunkababe.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.hunkababe.com"&gt;http://www.hunkababe.com&lt;/a&gt;..so far it's nice social network also..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ana</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 01:00:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10334727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iTbay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:57:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10333646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what a big misconception... :(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blogistory</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10333443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Victoria - there are websites devoted to foot and rubber fetishes as well, does that automatically mean all photos of feet and rubber gloves are sexual content?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our society has a tragedy - of babies denied health and normal development, and of women made to feel like their bodies don't work.  Much of that is because women have not been allowed to grow with breastfeeding and see it as normal ( &lt;a href="http://fusionparenting.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/children-copy-their-mothers/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://fusionparenting.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/children-copy-their-mothers/"&gt;http://fusionparenting.word...&lt;/a&gt; ), which is why it has been confused with sexuality by so many people.  Just because a few people think it is sexual that is their situation to deal with, not for the rest of us to hide from them.  The same way I don't hide my feet just in case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We need to get to a point where we don't even notice breastfeeding because it is expected.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10332946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;C'mon, lady! If you call breastfeeding a "fetish", I'm sorry to tell you that you really are not a reasonable person! Remember that if you are alive today it's because at some moment of your life, at least once, you mother breastfed you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gislaine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 22:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10331417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is, if they don't block it, you'll get these stupid Attorneys General in the US who get all up in arms over something like this, and they go after Facebook for showing inappropriate content (and then they take credit for saving the public from said "bad" content). So Facebook ends up running scared and blocking stuff that makes no sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MisterBill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 22:18:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10330847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with the "un-ban" of the scars, but I also agree with the ban on breast feeding.  Apparently, I am not a reasonable person because of this.  There are websites dedicated to the fetish of breastfeeding, so this would be sexual content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The last sentence is a good summary of Facebook.  Wish they would follow through on their privacy policies, though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Victoria</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10330378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So they're tits right?  Does Facebook really need to protect us against tits?  Where is George Carlin when we need him?  Facebook, get over it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mojo Yugen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10330273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I guess they must believe Facebook members are crazy perverts for seeing breastfeeding and cancer scars as something sexual.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bas Grasmayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:20:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10330007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for writing about this. I was unhappy about the breastfeeding picture ban, and I think the ban on Sharon's surgery photos was also ridiculous. Love the closing sentence - it's an excellent summary of Facebook's outlook!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Analisa Roche</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:06:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10329860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is it so difficult for Facebook to have a policy such as Flickr's (where photos are rated by type?)  And, on a closed profile, why should they remove photos at all?  Isn't it me sharing amongst my friends?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reminds me of how Walmart used to "disappear" photos when being developed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jillian C. York</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10328880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Facebook may have successfully expanded beyond its college roots, but its content policies remain woefully immature."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Truly says it all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lo in SoJo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:03:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10328805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad Facebook corrected its original decision.  Censoring information is always a tricky business.  Social media help publicize wrong decisions in this area much faster.  So from this perspective, we are all participating in censoring now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yuping Liu-Thompkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:00:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10328793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not so sure it's wrong to eliminate all totally visible breasts in any photo regardless of the context. You already stated one reason is deleting good photos by mistake, which is due to the sheer volume of photos that are screened. You have to give Facebook or any site a little credit for having their policy which keeps material from becoming inappropriate. Just because we don't think a photo is sexual doesn't mean someone else will interpret the same way. I don't think Facebook is trying to be insensitive to breast cancer or breastfeeding - I'll give them a little leeway. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marsha</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10328736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool post man... Doesn't Facebook revolve around the whole notion of its users 'reporting' offensive or explicit content? Either way, it's absolutely bogus if the moderators are reading too far into that sort of thing. And obviously that woman made her profile public, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nov0caine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10328647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't wait to show off my testicle scars.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">swag</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:52:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Is Very Confused About Breasts</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/05/31/facebook-breasts/#comment-10328619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook is really the best website on the net&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oday nasser</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 19:51:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>