<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/do_we_really_need_twitter_search_alternatives/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:43:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8210569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://TwitterPowerSearch.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://TwitterPowerSearch.com"&gt;http://TwitterPowerSearch.com&lt;/a&gt; uses the twitter API to display real time results&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TwitterPowerSearch</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8202764</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The more search alternatives, the better IMO.  Constantly pushing the envelope is how new ideas are born and you never know what is possible until you are pushed to try.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I saw in a video that the recent Moldovan protesters used multiple twitter search alternatives to co-ordinate and plan the protests.  As a result "more than 10,000 people turned up at this protest.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's the link:  &lt;a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/twittering_a_revolution/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newsy.com/videos/twittering_a_revolution/"&gt;http://www.newsy.com/videos...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8198146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think we've done this one yet ... perhaps we will :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:47:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8190766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think it is a question of providing some 'big' alternative to Twitter search, for me it is more about helping users surface useful information from the real-time web and finding new and innovative ways of mining and leveraging Twitter data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In March, I launched a Twitter search tool called tweetzi which I feel has an optimized interface for searching Twitter, along with controls that allow users to PLAY and PAUSE the tweet stream.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://tweetzi.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tweetzi.com"&gt;http://tweetzi.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Video Overview&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.vimeo.com/4090276" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.vimeo.com/4090276"&gt;http://www.vimeo.com/4090276&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig Hughes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:27:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8179098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree. An objective comparison of the various "search engines" would be invaluable to professionals and novices alike. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soph Guellard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:41:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8178543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone--if not Mashable--compared the pros and cons of each of these search engines in terms of usability, features, cross-browser performance, etc? That would be very useful to me and I'm sure countless others.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ari Herzog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8154079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that Twitter has so  much going on already, but they are the new darling it seems. Anything they do now will not surprise me, they probably have so many surprises in the future to unfold. Only time will tell!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.IdGoBack.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.IdGoBack.com"&gt;http://www.IdGoBack.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8138191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you are right&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">helen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8137127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter search is good when it comes to monitoring mentions about a brand and company (ie a use case where you want to scan every result) but it is terribly weak if you want to get a synthesis of what is going on regarding a specific event or topic (too much noise). What I like about twazzup is that it keeps the noisy river but adds value to it by automating the extractions of things the use might care about: retweet patterns, pictures, links, music, video, people). You are right that twitter might go in that direction over time but between now and then I think that the choice between twazzup and twitter search is no brainer: twazzup offers a better experience. No?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edwin Khodabakchian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:21:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8136959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alternative options are good. People have their preferences when it comes to browsers (I'm a Chrome fan) and this has been good users. The same can apply to Twitter search. Twazzup looks like a great alternative to Summize.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Le'cand-Harwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8136774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Adam - no I did understand your comment, I just do not agree.  Personally I think the ultimate winner will NOT be Summize (Twitter), more likely will be Google - or a 3rd party who can do *live search* but not limited to the Twitterspere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS - in answer to your other comment - One can already search within Twitter and limited to only certain follows using powertwitter&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:03:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8136586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In other words: reinventing Technorati in Twitter clothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">swag</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:54:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8136551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's not what I'm saying at all ... but the Twitter search engines compete directly with Twitter ever since Twitter bought Summize.  Other areas, like clients, mobile apps, or niche communities (ie - Stocktwits) are areas Twitter likely won't touch, making them better investments imho.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:52:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8136451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good article. My partner and I are just finishing development of a twitter site (&lt;a href="http://www.tweetRSVP.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.tweetRSVP.com"&gt;www.tweetRSVP.com&lt;/a&gt;) focused on posting tweets that include a question or call for a response. We know that there is a chance somebody with better funding and more resources may come along, copy the best features of our site and dwarf us. So, why did we work so hard, neglect other projects and take on the extra fees of a VPS host plan?  We developed the site because of the challenge of building a site that visitors will appreciate and, just maybe, that will become one of top twitter related sites.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andum</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:48:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8128850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that seems to be the premise of tweefind (one of the apps I mentioned).  I imagine at some point we'll at least see the ability to search only within those you follow, much like friendfeed does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Ostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8127871</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW...So according to that logic - no one should ever build something for any ecosystem (including Twitter) ...what a hoot!  Twitter (let alone Twitter Search) is in the 1st inning.  Not only WILL great money be made...It is being made currently ... Just look at &lt;a href="http://unboundtech.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="unboundtech.com"&gt;unboundtech.com&lt;/a&gt; as just one example of mining social data from Twitter and others ... They get anywhere between $3k to $50k a pop from their agency and brand clients ... Now go back to your Twitter search box and search for "Do we really need search alternatives" so you can monitor the buzz your article gets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/A_F"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:15:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8127613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of these days, one of these twitter search apps will have to come up with twitter authority search... so instead of just showing every tweet, it shows tweets based on rankings (similar to google).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adarsh Pallian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>