<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/did_digg_just_dodge_a_mikeyy_worm/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:21:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8684673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, that means something weird is going on with feeds websites &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angelina Jolie Sunglasses</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:21:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8604822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm surprised they didn't ban him as well. Digg love to ban people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Probably Sucks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:43:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8478602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These upstarts are definitely cash strapped, you can tell because their entire digital security strategy evolves around reacting to helpful hackers as odd as that is.  I've known for a while that social networking sites have their fair share of risks thanks to this group of articles &lt;a href="http://www.justaskgemalto.com/en/search/node/facebook" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.justaskgemalto.com/en/search/node/facebook"&gt;http://www.justaskgemalto.c...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KTG</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:40:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8344555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Citizen reactions - news concept site launches and has immediate adoption. &lt;a href="http://hookk.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://hookk.com"&gt;http://hookk.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:45:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8338834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's done easily now on Twitter, but it shouldn't be. It's a simple matter of escaping all HTML in forms. Weird Twitter hasn't done this yet, and I don't know what this says about their competence&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">genieyclo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:37:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8338800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's confirmation of what he claims: &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/justjen/statuses/1551894589" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/justjen/statuses/1551894589"&gt;http://twitter.com/justjen/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Westley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:35:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8338562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pardon me for being naive, but as social networking sites that attract millions of users should this be happening to them?  I dont know much about programming or even much about how the internet works but If these guys really decide to create problems, it seems to me that it can be done easily (well maybe not all the time), but it could have been worst and us users would be recipients of viral issue (so to speak). If I'm wrong someone please correct me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Social Press</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8337126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe an external service, or a compromised account? Depends on what the posts are...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Somers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:15:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Digg Just Dodge a Mikeyy Worm?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/18/digg-mikeyy-worm/#comment-8336276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This mornin I was on the ole TweetDeck and one of the huys I follow spewed about 10-20 posts simultaniously....When I asked him about it later he said he wasnt even logged in and his computer was TURNED off at the time....That was this morning 4-18-09...Is Twitters worm problem REALLY fixed ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JoeHenryJr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:16:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>