-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/09/22/microsoft-courier/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
149 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
150 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
6 hours ago · 98 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
2 hours ago · 15 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
6 hours ago · 28 comments
-
Google Launches Chrome for Mac
8 hours ago · 31 comments
-
iPhone App Offers Instant Speech-to-Text Transcription
5 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
--
that's why the ("rumored") 9" Apple tablet/fat-iPod could be a success, while, this MS concept won't never reach the market
So, you're convinced that they will be able to make this and get it in the market then, great! (I never don't like double negatives ;-))
More to the point, I will take a dual screen over a larger single screen. Makes it easier for separation of tasks and sharing between. The video presents this nicely.
I look at this thing as being like a planner, journal, tablet all in one. Has PDA functions for contacts and calendars, a possibly well thought out journal structure that handles multimedia, and can browse the internet (hopefully better browser than the Zune HD seems to have).
My guess would be that this is not Windows 7 based but CE (like XBox and Zune) and if it is far enough out then it could use a second generation Tegra.
Cost could definitely be an issue but it could also depend on what the target market is. If it does come in at too high a price point it would have to be aimed at something other than the general consumer market.
I wonder if it'll run Snow Leopard?
So I understand (as another Mac user ;-) but Windows is very heavy on resources, and portable devices need great battery life, instant on (don't you just love that about the Macbook?) and a snappy UI - all of which are difficult with a bloated OS on a small device. I really hope they do get it together, as competition is always good, but I'm not holding my breath. As Leon says, the corporate drones are likely to kill it off even if the engineers make something cool.
Except the Apple Tablet exists nowhere expect in people's minds, and this at the very least is a prototype. You guys should stop comparing devices to this thing you are just dreaming about, and wait until there is something you can actually compare it to.
Let's all say it together: There is no Apple Tablet. Maybe one day there will be, but not today.
Second, to quote the source article on Gizmodo, "Courier is a real device, and we've heard that it's in the 'late prototype' stage of development." So that's that.
For years people speculated about what could one day become the iPhone, and when it finally became real, it was nothing like anyone expected, in both good and bad ways. And yet, people are comparing and criticizing new ideas and new products against this dream they have of what the iTablet could be, when in reality (assuming it becomes real), this device probably won't be anything like whatever they imagine it will be.
The Courier, as far from retail as it might be right now, is a real product. At least a real direction for a product, something that can be criticized. Comparing this to the iTablet is comparing it to The Perfect Device I Imagined From The Best Components Without Regard For Price™: it's not only unrealistic, it's unfair to the people that are trying to create good products you can actually buy for a reasonable price.
Personally I also think that is sad to see anyone regard a company only interested in profit like Apple (and any other company, for that matter) as this all-knowing, never-wrong entity that turns all it touches to gold. Makes it really hard for them to notice its mistakes, which are not few.
I don't know what YOU'RE doing - but my experience is nothing like yours. Perhaps you've got the wrong driver installed. For some reason, Microsoft ships the 'tablet PC' version of the Wacom driver, which essentially reduces the pressure sensitivity to two levels - on and off. If you go over to Wacom's site and get the PenEnabled driver, it gives you full Wacom pressure support.
On the other hand, yes, typing on a screen sucks. That's why most current tablet PCs are convertables.
I'm also not sure if the existing OS-es work as well on touch-screen devices. Given the way we need to use computers - type to enter, its presumptuous to expect that pen input (with its own limitations) will take off. Which is why we see on-screen k'boards playing a key role.
Does this mean that touch-screen devices will essentially be used as "laptop" computers with the screens replacing the keyboard?
Usually they wait a year to see the products flaws and then fix them with their new product, which is never innovative and just looked at as a copy cat.
But this is different. Its like the Amazon Kindle and Mini computer combined.
Windows? Puhleeze. I've used computers since 1983 - AT - IBM - Wordperfect in DOS - The very first version of Pagemaker - All Adobe products in both Windows and Mac environments - early Apple machines - Mac 512 K --- early Mac laptops - many versions of Windows - Dells - Acers - HP - Powerbooks - PowerPC - Macbook - Macbook Pro --- The non-apple products have been at work. I have always owned Macs at home. I can't imagine Microsoft ever creating a product I would actually want to buy.
I can picture myself sitting in a meeting where I have a document (e.g. minutes) in the lefthand panel and the making (handwritten) notes in the righthand panel. Notes can be selected by drawing a box around it (as outlined in the demo) and linked to the document in the lefthand panel by dragging and dropping. This is a major paradigm shift in usability that the machine adopts itself to me rather than I need to adopt myself to the machine.
COURIERTABLETSTORE.COM
COURIERNOTEBOOKFORUM.COM
BUYCOURIERNOTEBOOK.COM
BUYCOURIERTABLET.COM
MICROSOFTCOURIERNOTEBOOK.COM
COURIERTABLETFORUM.COM
BUYCOURIERNOTEBOOKS.COM
COURIERNOTEBOOK.COM
COURIERTABLETSHOP.COM
COURIERNOTEBOOKS.COM
Contact courierdomains@gmail.com
As for the whole dual screen vs. single large screen, I too would take the dual screen. Touch typing on the same screen with both hands can be painfully annoying, especially when you can't view the screen bcoz of your fingers blocking it.
I will buy it even faster if I can set it down, tilt one of the screens up, get a virtual keyboard on the bottom screen, and use it like a netbook. That would be my ULTIMATE portable device. But I doubt MS would ever do something that sensible. :P