<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/confirmed_digg_just_hijacked_your_twitter_links/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:58:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-14870560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do not care what you call it, black hat, white hat, red hat. I will not&lt;br&gt;click on a digg link because I know it will not take me to the site offered.&lt;br&gt;A bookmark is supposed to take you where you want to go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-14869789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"I'm going to have to disagree with your use of the word 'blackhat'. Because this shift in policy in no way automates the process of converting users to a Digg account."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WTF are you talking about. Because it doesn't automate users into a digg acount it's not black hat? What they did is exactly the equivalent of black hat, but your definition of black hat is someone that automates users into opening an account?  Get a clue!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerald Weber</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-13780668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree here. The things that "shock" social media people strike me as fairly trivial. But that's just me. I recognize that each person has his or her own perspective about something like this. So for me NOT to be "shocked" isn't necessarily the correct response - it's just mine. But you put it pretty well, I think.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I had some similar thoughts social media "crowd-thuggery" that were prompted by the story of the tweeter who was sued by her landlord for $50 thousand for a tweet she had posted about them. It seems that social media people are trying to have it both ways. "If I Had A Social Media Hammer" &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/TOegB" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/TOegB"&gt;http://bit.ly/TOegB&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@pbarbanes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 09:26:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-13775332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess the rules of the game are constantly changing - hypnotic marketing, eh?!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dagmar&lt;br&gt;Trading results that make you say W.O.W.&lt;br&gt;Follow me on &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/tradingrichmom" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/tradingrichmom"&gt;http://twitter.com/tradingr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dagmar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 03:31:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-13217728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Splitting hair has new meaning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">L Carolan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:20:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-13196024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Combine this with the Digg Bar and it seems like Digg's arrogance will be its downfall.  When you get greedy with your traffic at the expense of your users, the only way is downwards IMHO.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:03:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-13006342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hopefully Kevin will fix this, but it now sounds like a business model for some less scrupulous webmasters. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">camp185</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:49:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12995413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice Post!&lt;br&gt;Thanks for sharing the information...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Increase website traffic</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:41:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12964808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm, redirecting folks to St. Louis? Probably not. It's more like aggregating AP or Reuters content to Mashable. I do agree however that if the right thing to do is to point traffic back to the originating site, but there is the simple fact that if you intentionally use Diggbar, you agreed to it's actions on your link. At this point, it's kinda like TV, if you don't like the show, change the channel. If you don't like what Digg is doing, don't use 'em.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:08:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12964311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmmm.... not sure on this... The are other url shortners... I think the one I used was zane... who (in the small print of course) specify a maximun number of clicks and then redirect the url... You kind of expect this from small site... but from Digg? Me thinks they will change it back shortly...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">onelifenofear</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:55:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12963797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh please, get off your high horse.  Things happen, besides one would think Jay would be the controller and even then if you truly folly Kevin you would know both of them are smart enough to understand that doing something like this would backfire.  More then likely one of their code-monkeys made a stupid mistake.  For Kevin not to know about something like this means it didn't go through the proper channels.  I absolutely love all the dramatizing of people crying victim and fou people love to play the role.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I love all these other comments about taking ownership and what not from more then likely people who haven't a clue what happens inside a company.  Are you people so dense you dont even know who the "boss" is.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Megapewpew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:41:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12963392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rose: "No, I just founded the bloody thing. I don't have any idea what's on the roadmap".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12962668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Megapewpew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:09:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12961817</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I dunno, I thought it was fairly obvious someone just made a mistake.  Kevin and Jay aren't stupid when it comes to things like this.  They would have known it would look bad for them.  While ya it was a big mistake I swear some of you like to play the drama card a little to much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Megapewpew</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:51:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12961691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;simowner70@gmail.&lt;br&gt;Twitter is like a breath of fresh air on the Social Media scene. I have been on it for just a few weeks now and I have met several interesting people. It is a platform to network with people you would like to meet in real life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;KZ&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.epostmailer.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.epostmailer.com/"&gt;Bulk Email Marketing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">spryka</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:48:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12961295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm calling shenanigans on him being on vacation and not being aware of the change. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerald Weber</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:37:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12959607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sad to hear about this, but thanks for posting this very valuable info. I can't help but agree. This will greatly impact Digg users.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michelle Dale</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:57:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12956226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That really sucks. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blupa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:46:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12954629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keif, take a minute to read the complaints and it might help you understand what the uproar is about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First of all, Digg has redirected a TON of links to their site that WERE helping the source sites rank in search engines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Secondly, Digg already knows the problem with this approach as they dealt with the issue when they first launched the DiggBar. To change things now is a pathetic &amp;amp; desperate attempt to get more traffic. It's obvious they need to bring in revenue and fast, but this is NOT the way to go about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Cook</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12949704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eh! Nasty. Never Digging anything again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bas Grasmayer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:25:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12944893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Digg cant take its followers and community for granted. How can Kevin Rose be oblivious to these changes. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ambarish Mitra</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:23:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12943164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;May be you are right .. Steve ... may be it the idea was too fascinating for Digg ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;br&gt;Daina&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daina Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:41:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12942721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah right Kevin Rose, you were not aware of these changes! That is going down as one of the funniest tweets of the year, what do u think we all are? stupids to say the least!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Splinter09</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:02:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12942351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;should we say that &lt;a href="http://Digg.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Digg.com"&gt;Digg.com&lt;/a&gt; not using the  friendly 301 redirect right now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aniruddh D</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:24:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confirmed: Digg Just Hijacked Your Twitter Links</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/19/digg-twitter-links/#comment-12942185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*buries &lt;a href="http://digg.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="digg.com"&gt;digg.com&lt;/a&gt;*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Awais Imran</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>