DISQUS

Mashable - The Social Media Guide: Cameron Diaz and Mike Myers Banned From Twitter?

  • Dave Luke · 1 month ago
    Is it taking away from their freedom of speech or displaying distrust in their actors/actresses? How would we like it if there was a clause on our lives. Surely relying on the actors/actresses common sense would be enough instead of limiting them.
  • The Wandering Foodie · 1 month ago
    I'm not going to do this, but I'd like to see a twitter account "What would Chad Ochocinco be tweeting right now" during games. Maybe they could put it in the ticker of the Bengals game each week. Like "Damn Palmer, is it too much to ask not to hang me out in the secondary like that? Ray hits hard" or "Glad Fitzpatrick found somewhere to play. Always liked that kid"
  • Evan Pederson · 1 month ago
    This would be awesome. =D
  • Jeff · 1 month ago
    Imo, free speech has nothing to do with it. It's like me working for a programming company and signing a paper/contract stating not to leak company secrets.
  • accela · 1 month ago
    Yes, but they don't ban you from talking to others completely, or ban you from emailing people completely.
  • gerardmclean · 1 month ago
    Social media amplifies and distributes information in hypertime, without regard for geography. Look at Balloon Boy. Would this hoax even be possible without twitter? Maybe, but 100-150 tweets every few seconds? Statements like "You can also leak information by, you know, speaking, or writing an email" is immature and naive (and in the case of Mashable, self-serving)
  • Seika · 1 month ago
    Besides, they can speak or write e-mail to probably limited number of journalists, in which the movie studio know where to send their intimidation if they want to. But Twitter... it goes straight to the followers, and more.

    Is it about deliberate leaking or accidental that they're concerned with by such no social network rule ?
  • Robert Bravery · 1 month ago
    Yeah, but what about the stand in Grip, or the daily sweaper. Some one will find way to leak something. THats the nature of the internet
  • r0cketman22 · 1 month ago
    Exactly.
  • manhattanRE · 1 month ago
    Twitter's whole business depends on celebrities being available to stalk. If they start banning them, they might as well throw in the towel
  • Jerry Zambrano · 1 month ago
    This is too funny. It's a trend getting out of control. It's demonizing social communities, when any avenue of disclosing information is available... i.e. email, other blogs, word of mouth etc.
  • Jetsgirl · 1 month ago
    This is really too bad, its like chopping off the hand that's feeding them, their fans, and the social mainstream.. Its my hope they come to realize the power & future of social media & perhaps find some kind of way to moderate things, lay some ground rules using social media to their BENEFIT and viewing it as the useful tool in promotion that it is.
  • Ortwin Oberhauser · 1 month ago
    hi :-) I don't feel pity for Cameron, this is for sure nothing more than a good promotion for the next movie and as we see it works ;-).

    Best regards from Austria
    Ortwin Oberhauser
    feel free & follow me on Twitter
    http://twitter.com/Oberhauser
    @Oberhauser < :-) & this is the promotion for my Twitter account ;-) Thank you Cameron
  • WeaponII · 1 month ago
    Were they really interested in the first place? I doubt it. So this basically doesn't change either of their routines anyways.

    Water under the bridge I suppose.
  • Jetsgirl · 1 month ago
    -and here I was thinking just the opposite waay back in wk 2 I remember reviewing Mark Sanchez' twitter, thinking wow this guy needs to step up his online presence STAT! or hire a virtual assistant.. he still had tweets re college ball & NOTHING since playn proball w NFL..Jay Feely, Nick Mangold, & few others on my team tweet frequently.. Good PR for sure. This is just an example Im using...
  • crystaljane · 1 month ago
    I think that's only good for them celebrities. It's for their protection.
  • Barry Manneer · 1 month ago
    So, So what they're still movie stars
    They got their rock moves
    And they don't need to tweet
    And guess what
    They're havin more fun
    And now that this is done
    They gonna show you in next Shrek
    That they're alright
    they're just fine
    And Twitter is a tool so
    So, so what...
  • Name · 1 month ago
    Calm down - its just lawyers being lawyers. Everyone needs to take a chill.
  • kachingkaching · 1 month ago
    damn they own our data and they even listen to our conversation hmmmn signs of the time

    http://kachingkaching.com/kachingkaching
    http://blastoffpress.com
    http://evolvhealthy.com
  • Kirsten · 1 month ago
    If people want to tell others about their new movie, let them! It's their own responsability
  • Layne · 1 month ago
    It's one thing to put a clause in their contracts prohibiting them from talking about their film in any public forum, including interviews, Twitter, Facebook, etc. But to outright ban them from joining or using Twitter? Makes no sense.
  • Entertainment2u-Twitter · 1 month ago
    The bigger question is...why would Myers or Diaz WANT to be on Twitter?
  • Batman · 1 month ago
    It would be interesting to see the specific clause that Dreamworks is using. Usually, when a movie decides it doesn't want publicity from its stars, it isn't any good.
  • Kent Leonhart · 1 month ago
    Exactly, why would they make it top secret. It's a modern age where people need to know the current event and happenings around the world be it good news or bad news as long as it's informative and most of all if we can help. And yeah, it's definitely no different from gossiping, writing or speaking to other people. Come on, media censorship and information control? LOL I'm not even sure if people would go haywire if aliens would be announce... but then again this is hollywood and not some conspiracy to coverup some sh*t going on. In short, it's just a freakin' movie. ROFL. Aaand they're just ordinary people afterall who want to share something.
  • Jetsgirl · 1 month ago
    -and here I was thinking just the opposite waay back in wk 2 of the NFL I remember reviewing Mark Sanchez' twitter, FB, social sites thinking wow this guy needs to step up his online presence STAT! or hire a virtual assistant.. he still had tweets re college ball & NOTHING since playing Proball with the NFL..Jay Feely, Nick Mangold, & few others on my team tweet frequently.. Good PR for sure. This is just an example Im using...but I dont see what is is they're not getting here!
  • xxteemo · 1 month ago
    Hollywood totally SUX. Bunch of popous overpaid, under worked wind bags if you ask me!

    Jess
    www.anonymous.ua.tc
  • 1stworldshoppingcenter · 1 month ago
    1stWorldShoppingCenter.com - Best buy shopping online, best buy, best buy directory, best buy locator, best buy shop, best buy shop directory, best buy shopping, best buy shopping directory, best buy store, best buy store directory, best buy stores, best buy stores directory, best buy online, best buy online directory, best buy online locator, best buy online store, best buy online stores, best buy online shop, best buy online shopping, best buy price, best buy prices, best buy prices directory, best buy prices locator
  • Jason Rukus · 1 month ago
    I'm always amused when a company or person fears something so much they react with pitch forks. It's the American way really, just ask the natives.

    Honestly though I doubt a twitter ban is in the actual contract because there is no need for it. Your typical non disclosure agreement already covers non disclosure. Let's for argument sake say there was one in there, and either of them cared about it, Dream Works needs them more than they need another Shrek movie so I doubt it would make it to the final contract.
  • Cameron Diaz · 1 month ago
    The new Shrek script is terribad anyway...Mike and I are just in it for the money, could care less if we can twitter about it or not.
  • Name · 1 month ago
    Evil evil Cameron and Mike. They should be banned. :)
    ND
  • Mandy Corvo · 1 month ago
    This is just ridiculous. If they want to spoil it there are other ways to do it than facebook or twitter.
  • Puneet · 1 month ago
    LMAO
  • Name · 1 month ago
    Just another comment http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34Hymu3vXKI
    New Dialect
  • queencamrothschild · 1 month ago
    thanks irresistable love beautiful ☆★★☆ Queen Cameron Diaz ♥ ☆★★☆ liveth alive for evermore fit promise sign i am so excited i almost cried i love you.:) cam xxxxxx australia january 22, 2009 Cameron Diaz official in Israel pefect praise, bless, worship, adore, cherish, as one from everlasting, and to everlasting "Irresistable" praise song by Darlene Zschech. Bless, praise, worship, adore, cherish liveth Queen Cameron Diaz alive for evermore and you will be blessed. Thanks irresistable love beautiful Queen Cameron Diaz alive for evermore in thought, or deed see & hear the green hornet for those that hide from taken away the key of knowledge from a thanks Holy engagement, marriage, nation, justice system, and thanks Holy Spirit people.(Deuteronomy 6:20)(for the in Christ luke 11:52) first love
  • avinkline · 1 month ago
    So did they ban them from Twitter, or just ban them from disclosing private info over Twitter. If it's the latter, I don't see anything wrong here.
  • Name · 1 month ago
  • mediaista · 1 month ago
    From the title, I though that the Twitter admins banned Diaz and Meyers from posting.
  • Ryan Lalonde · 1 month ago
    I don't agree with them being banned from Twitter but of course they need to keep the movies secret. I still think they should be able to tweet about their life tho.
  • Cat · 1 month ago
    I realize this article is supposed to make me say "wow, censoring actors, that's dumb", but all it's making me say is "Wow, a new Shrek movie, that's dumb".
  • Senderok Allen · 1 month ago
    Sorry folks...I see this "controversy" as an excellent way for everyone involved to get us to start anticipating a new Shrek movie.

    And its working. :-)
  • AspNet · 1 month ago
    Glad to hear that!
  • kelly · 1 month ago
    Thanks for this post! RTs is one of the most mis-used thing on Twitter.

    Despite warnings to a twitter member he continually DMed ppl to say my blog was a malware distribution site. He referred to me as a NAUGHTY TWEETER. It's totally untrue. I warned his RTers and 3 took down the RT.

    My blog NEVER hosted malware of any kind. He was unable to tell me the malware proggie name and which page he saw it, that he said his Norton anti-virus had spotted. I told him to take down his misleading tweets while I try to sort things out on my end. He did not cooperate.

    While all these are going on, 2 IT teams and several other Twitter members told me they don't spot anything malware. My webhosting service provider only said it was a Badge link causing the problem and I promptly removed it.

    Currently I am working out with my webhosting provider on how to remove SKADOODLE.com ad links in my blog (previously he said it was another advertiser's link) as I cannot even log into my wordpress dashboard. Skadoodle.com ad links - they are flagged by Google to be hosting malware. My blog became an unknowing victim.

    I remember this Twitter member had asked me questions about vaccines and health. He does not believe in the anti-vaccine logic nor about the toxins in them. Everytime I followed him back, he unfollowed me. I unfollowed him too. And he will follow me back again, the whole cycle repeats. I shoulda sense TROUBLE earlier but I did not. This was a Twitter member with a hidden agenda who wanted my Twitter account and blog DEAD.

    Learn from my mistakes!
    http://twitter.com/qutequte/status/5256507983
    http://twitter.com/qutequte/status/5256632146