<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/breaking_google_announces_search_deal_with_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:49:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-21009935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it is excellent!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blackjack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:49:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-21004976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I must say that i've been using webmynd features of showing contextual tweets on google searches for a while now, and before that used a custom greasemonkey userscript in FF. The ability to cross-reference results between the two in the same browser tab is priceless. Twitter is definitely stepping aside of an advertising based model with this move, and good for them. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anatólio Nobre</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:53:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20915435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice news for Twitter updaters! Thanks to Twitterfeed and its clones!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SOUTHSPICE</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:37:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20874412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Search Engine Clutter.  The last thing I want to see in the search engine results when I am search for products, services, and information are tweets.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deirdre Cavener</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:25:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20812241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;More reasons for businesses to have a Twitter and Facebook page...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:21:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20812030</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We have been recommending to our clients that they get a Twitter and a Facebook page, it has just become ever more essential for their internet presence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:15:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20801754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh ya this is huge news. Nice twitter posts will show up in google. About time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">e cigarette</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:36:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20779968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting development. Hope Google will not buy out Twitter! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sree</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:36:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20774128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think i'll be deleting my twitter then.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Patrelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20769192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow very very good news for all of us Twitter users!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kayladawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:18:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20762219</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is great news  for users  google&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.itechtalk.com/2009/absolute-acai-berry-review-does-absolute-acai-berry-work" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.itechtalk.com/2009/absolute-acai-berry-review-does-absolute-acai-berry-work"&gt;absolute acaiberry &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuartfile</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20761730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Checkout &lt;a href="http://www.mytweetmark.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mytweetmark.com"&gt;http://www.mytweetmark.com&lt;/a&gt; :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mytweetmark</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20761683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess google is still bitter over facebook?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Nash</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20761568</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is a bunch of spam. And folks with websites are using twitter to link to own websites. Also seeing YouTube partners tweet and linking to own youtube partner sites -- can't understand why google is allowing this to happen --- this is clearly artificially increasing video views and partners make money off of views w/ google adsense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pete Kosednar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:02:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20760946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No sure I like Bing's implementation of Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No wait. I do know. I don't like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BecomeAnSEO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20758778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Im tellin ya dude. One day Google is going to rule the world!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;RT&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.anonymous.ua.tc" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.anonymous.ua.tc"&gt;www.anonymous.ua.tc&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxteemo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:31:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20757619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google didn't waste anytime to include the same function as Bing. They want to stay at the top.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mandy Corvo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:14:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20754952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent news. I was wondering how long it will take for google to close this deal. I guess it also rests the twitter revenue model debate. At least for a while&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mani</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:37:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20753988</link><description>&lt;p&gt;google copy machines are busy! &lt;br&gt;panoramio copying photosynth&lt;br&gt;wave machine translation bot copying messenger translation robot&lt;br&gt;and now this...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:11:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20751938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you taken a look at Bing's Twitter?  Nothing but a hot mess of chaos.  I expect Google to integrate tweets much better, possibly a side column that you can choose to see or not.  Score again Google!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sonya A. Willis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:20:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20751825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So all of a sudden Twitter might be turning a very nice profit?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Barrington</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:17:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20751559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like a big deal! Great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mohamed Amine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:10:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20749932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Today with Bing partnership with Twitter first, was upset that Google didnt do anything ~ wow was i ever wrong. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iTbay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20749418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Showing some random feed of Tweets is a Microsoft move and I some how doubt Google will make such a pointless function.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I were to guess, I would say you will only see Tweets when they are relevant, and where they would make sense depending on there corresponding relevance to the search term. Meaning, sometimes they will be on top, some times else where on the page. But you can bet they will not clutter the page with useless links and will almost always be a useful and welcome addition to the front page.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EntrepreNerd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Google Announces Search Deal With Twitter</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/21/google-twitter-search-deal/#comment-20748982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is great news both Bing and Google in a heated competition for the best real-time results. There are 3 critical factors to success on any front &lt;a href="http://ow.ly/vNGJ" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ow.ly/vNGJ"&gt;http://ow.ly/vNGJ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jvasko</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:06:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>