-
Website
http://mashable.com/ -
Original page
http://mashable.com/2009/02/23/bank-of-obama/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Robert Basil
142 comments · 8 points
-
Jennifer Van Grove
151 comments · 23 points
-
r0cketman22
317 comments · 52 points
-
rajagiri4
160 comments · 2 points
-
barringtonarch
152 comments · 4 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
13 hours ago · 112 comments
-
MySpace Shuts Down imeem and Its App Community
2 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Redbox: The Enemy of the Entertainment Industry? [STUDY]
5 hours ago · 17 comments
-
Head to Head: Chrome for Mac vs. Chrome for Windows
9 hours ago · 24 comments
-
Your Next Car Radio Might Be Pandora
13 hours ago · 32 comments
-
Enter the Zappos Sharing Happiness $3,000 Shopping Spree Giveaway Contest
This crisis is not a new one - it has been forecasted a long time.
I have heard it on financial forums, on decidedly non financial forums.
A bit of practical help
How to search properly - not just skim the google top ten
http://searchwiki.wikispaces.com/
http://www.lulu.com/content/6141415
I realize this post is just about a silly joke site where you can print a bogus check (which is not unlike what the Congress has done... randomly spending money on "things" without real regard to the effectiveness). But there seems to be a silence about the real saviour to the economic woes and that is the people who take risks, create products & services, start companies, create jobs, etc.... We need to quit sitting on the side lines.
The people who read Mashable are the heart of those who understand and strive for entrepreneurship. Why not some noise being made here and on other tech related sites. Why are we not clamouring for attention to be paid to those who can make things happen?
Instead we get posts about fake checks to send your friends? Come on.
And add about it being ironic: one thing I see as differentiating this with what the gov. is doing is that I am able to choose where my money goes. I can choose to, or not to, spend $2.99 on this. Whereas, I am unable to choose where the gov. money goes.
How would you feel if the gov. determined that this $2.99 was "worthwhile" and so something everyone had to spend, then pulled it from your income, regardless.
Consumers suffer, the company wins (short-term, until no one has $2.99 to spend). The irony is that the gov. is the one whose building big lazy, corrupt corporations, and stupid care-free (ie. do not need to make any personal decisions) people by doing this. The very thing it's trying to correct.