<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/at038t_offers_150_adapter_to_improve_service_quality/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:09:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-23696399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This adapter increases the signal strength of our 3G phone by allowing us to make calls using the Internet connection.So, we get full bars of service in our home, regardless of our cell-tower proximity. &lt;br&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ram</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:09:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-20616188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is pissing me off.  I've searched for hours looking for a wi-fi phone solution, then I remembered this article.  You can get Skype for a few dollars a month and make unlimited phone calls on your computer.  You can get a USB phone for a little over $20 which needs for you to have your computer on or a wireless phone, similar to a cellphone for about $120, which just needs wi-fi, computer doesn't have to be on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can just get that, and spend about $9 a month on skype to make and receive phone calls in my house.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T makes you pay $150 PLUS $20 a month!  That is ridiculous.  It would be good if it didn't have the monthly fee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The $20 a month is what I WOULD BE saving by getting the device in the first place!&lt;br&gt;Right now my plan is $60 with free nights and weekends.  I can just get skype during the day when I'm at home and use my cell at night and change to a $40 plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mechanesthesia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:32:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-18357982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great news -- that a device is coming soon to provide better cell coverage in my home (I seem to be in a gully and only get 0 to 2 bars, 3 if I lean over my patio fence!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BUT why do I have to pay extra for service I'm already paying for?  So, I'm rewarding their BAD cell network?!?!  Doesn't make sense...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Which reminds me... I'm gonna call ATT and complain...they will usually give me a account credit a couple times a year!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxxciter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:47:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17216031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Signal repeaters are about $150-200, don't have a limit on the number of connections, and work with any carrier. And they don't require a high-speed internet connection. As long as you get a signal somewhere outside (which is pretty likely), they'll work. I think they're a much better option for most people than MicroCell.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brandon Eley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17215611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't many of us already have a device that allows us to make voice calls over hard-wire using bandwidth that we already pay for? I believe it's called a "home phone". Maybe AT&amp;amp;T can improve its service by offering a bracket that allows users to bolt their iPhone to their regular home phone so that users can look at the $$$ paperweight they bought while dialing for ATT dollars. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:47:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17157275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When you call Apple complain every time.  ATT is awful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:11:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17157192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;$150. +$20 a month  But why?  Because we are ATT.  An American money making machine.   Just pay us more, and we might give you actual service.  Then, if that doesn't work, we can find something else to charge you for.  I remember a fight with Comcast, ATT said coverage would be excellent and everywhere.  Opps lied again.  I would just like 2 bars, they said 3G was here. Opps  no service = 3G evidently.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carla</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:08:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17154384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Boo. For someone like me who is an at&amp;amp;t customer (both wireless and ISP), this makes no sense whatsoever. I live in a cell "hole" and would love to have a femtocell in my house, but not at that price. Let's try -- FREE!! This is the same company who won't run fiber to my house so I can take advantage of U-verse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">QuarkSpin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:49:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17154218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me see - to pay $150 on top of what I'm paying just to get the service I should be getting in the first place? Forget about...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:44:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17154156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;NO, absolutely not, ATT go to______! They told me 3G was here.  ATT is a money makin joke, not a phone service.  I pay enough, I will switch carriers first.  I have a thow away now, it is better than ATT service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carla</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:43:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17142108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From what I understand Verizon is not much better anyways. Dropped calls......If cars, both foreign and domestic were as bad as cell phones there would be a major recall.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobgpinhead</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17138869</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably because they don't feel like using a mobile phone standard that is used in the US, South Korea, and parts of Japan, as opposed to world-wide.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:52:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17121863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read a related article from CNet on dropped calls, delayed text and voice mail messages on the AT&amp;amp;T network. I have poor reception in my home as well (PA), but generally while traveling throughout the country (recently in San Diego), it worked extremely well (no dropped calls). My wife &amp;amp; I communicate via Texting when we are unable to call one another, and I have been frustrated with the delay in receiving text messages and even voice mail messages which are critical to my business. As I do work from home (in the Basement office), reception stinks, so yes I would absolutely like to get the Micro cell if one is available for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17121628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AT &amp;amp;T service rules.  Are you kidding??  Look at Verizon Wireless.  They have been overcharging for their network for decades.  Customer service SUCKS!!!!!!  At least at &amp;amp;t has quality people and products.  Give me one device that verizon has come out with that does not SUCK......   The BlackBerry storm, you know the one to compete with the I Phone, has a 50% return rate-&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Carpenter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17121363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you joking?  No, seriously, did I read that some clown just said that it's no secret that at &amp;amp;t's 3 G is slow.  WOW!!!  Why don't you come to upstate NY and see if your "theory" holds water.  AT &amp;amp; T service is like lightning here.  MUCH faster than Verizon.  Please stop with idiotic comments because you have stock in Verizon.  There is a reason Apple chose to be exclusive with &lt;br&gt;AT &amp;amp; T.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Carpenter</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17120027</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gee I thought my phone would work as a phone. I never know if I have a message and if I wish to check for one I have to call my phone. Somewhere along the line my phone decided to require a password to check my voicemail. I know I never picked one and it will not reset. At least I have an iPod that works. The 3G network is the pits. How about fixing the problem not charging more for a service that works only through a computer. I want my Razor back that worked everywhere in the states.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Broette</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17118245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple will be pi$$ed !!!  AT&amp;amp;T is FINALLY acknowledging connectivity and service issues with the iPhone.  And now they want to screw their customers. Verizon thinks they just died and went to heaven. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Doe</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:18:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17116580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another reason NOT to get the Apple phone!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17115283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know how well this is going to go over with customers. They are already paying enough for the service to begin with. They should get good cell reception without the need for an adapter. AT&amp;amp;T should give the adapter to people who they cannot provide good service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bestispoffers</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:02:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17108189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My thoughts exactly!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The best part is that AT&amp;amp;T is piggy-backing off of your ISP's network instead of building out there own. And on top of that they want to charge you an extra $20 a month to make use of some one else's bandwidth, which you already pay for. That is comedy gold.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EntrepreNerd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:44:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17105787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;why should I have to pay for a device and service to give me better cell coverage? i thought AT&amp;amp;T brags about having such great service...why not offer this to me free if i can prove i get shitty cell coverage at home? $20 a month? i can get vonage for that much if i want a phone at home that just works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Menzer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17074870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anybody heard of MicroCells being avaiable in Atlanta, San Antonio,  or Seattle, as some accounts claimed last week would happen today?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17073157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, so they are charging all this to give you VOIP? So is that why they banned the google voice apps?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, my first thought when I saw your title was: "A 150 adapter to improve AT&amp;amp;T service? A verizon phone"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Covati</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17070305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We iPhone users are just counting the days until Verision picks up the server and it's BYE BYE AT&amp;amp;T.  Paying 150.00 more  + 240 / year for service we should have anyway.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thedeveloper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:14:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T Offers $150 Adapter to Improve Service Quality</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/21/att-3g-microcell/#comment-17070256</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why should I pay an extra $150 for something that AT&amp;amp;T service ought to already include?  Utterly ridiculous and why I will be leaving as soon as my contact is up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Dick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:13:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>