<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/at038t_and_google_square_off_over_alleged_fcc_violations/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:30:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-18302171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is one of the biggest companies so i do not know if this is going to affect them. Pavlov &lt;a href="http://www.enato.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="photo competition"&gt;photo &lt;/a&gt;competition Blogger&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:30:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17833252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Always Google will win.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.seodoom.info/2009/09/start-your-seo-business-today-make-triple-your-profits/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.seodoom.info/2009/09/start-your-seo-business-today-make-triple-your-profits/"&gt;http://www.seodoom.info/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rajagiri4</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17759589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Instead of wasting their money on this crap, AT&amp;amp;T should be spending it on upgrading their infrastructure so they can fix the real problem, which is that they suck.  Horribly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad F.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:05:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17440127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google will win.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free Wii Points</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:02:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17417240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is typical. AT&amp;amp;T want to complicate the argument by attacking Google on a new front. This new tactic further reinforces my belief that AT&amp;amp;T was hand in hand with Apple on the rejection of Google Voice - despite the fact that Apple denies this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T think they're too big to be bullied. Wake up big corporation. You're not the only one in the business.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pranay Manocha</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:51:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17417219</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The bias is justified. Read the comments on previous related posts. 'Us' obviously refers to us commenters and tweeters.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pranay Manocha</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17411483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone remember that Tuesday in February '06 when AT&amp;amp;T got sued by the EFF for their role in the wiretapping program? Remember the Google's response to big brother at that time? This leaves the same aftertaste. AT&amp;amp;T can smooch my little green butt times ∞.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17404045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lets sit back and see where this goes. I'm hoping that Google wins this one and Apple and AT&amp;amp;T wake up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheBox193</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:06:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17402231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Most of us suspect Apple"?!?&lt;br&gt;If you can't write an article without a bias on a news site, you shouldn't be writing at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:08:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T and Google Square Off Over Alleged FCC Violations</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/25/att-letter-to-fcc/#comment-17400975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you say "Smoke screen" or "tantrum"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul O'Flaherty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>