<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in And The Oscar for Most Social Media Buzz Goes To …</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/and_the_oscar_for_most_social_media_buzz_goes_to/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:50:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: And The Oscar for Most Social Media Buzz Goes To …</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/23/oscars-social-media-buzz/#comment-6651388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just sent a twitter message, but thought I'd follow up with a comment since my message didn't make much sense in 140 characters.  Most of the younger stars have loads of nicknames  â€“ zefron, zacqisha, zanessa, nessa, baby v (Zac Efron and/or Vanessa Hudgens) - Rpattz, spunk ransom, patty (Robert Pattinson) - Gosh, I'm embarrassed that I even know that, but I was really surprised that the younger stars didnâ€™t show up on the list considering the amount of tweens on Twitter.  Do you know if they also tracked the stars by their shorter twitter nicknames or did they just track them by their full names?  If they didnâ€™t track their nicknames too they missed out on a lot of tweets. A good example, search â€œefronâ€ and then â€œzefronâ€ youâ€™ll see the difference in the results â€“ they donâ€™t overlap.  No biggie â€“ I'm just curiousâ€¦&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">e2beard</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:50:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And The Oscar for Most Social Media Buzz Goes To …</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/23/oscars-social-media-buzz/#comment-6651387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love the stats. Slumdog millionaire would have been my best guess anyway.  I haven't blogged or tweeted about any of these things, but maybe next time I will.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Campbell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:21:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And The Oscar for Most Social Media Buzz Goes To …</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/23/oscars-social-media-buzz/#comment-6651385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The best part is, this is all organic hype.  Too hard to coordinate on a massive scale.  People tweet about what they like.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adrian @ adriandayton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:58:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And The Oscar for Most Social Media Buzz Goes To …</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/02/23/oscars-social-media-buzz/#comment-6651384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hope Jaoquin Phoenix gets a Twitter account if he doesn't already have one. That would be instantly classic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keaton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:56:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>