<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/a_look_inside_the_twitter_admin_panel/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:29:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-12973664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;looked fake to me. Looked up a few people on Obamas block list. One was a preacher. Didnt seem to be radical one or racist either. I dont get why they were blocked. also a few others looked harmless enough. could be wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darius</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:29:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-12710300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm with Michael on this.  There is no clear path to discredit the image source without first eliminating the (very common and most likely) probability of an abberation introduced by awkward aspect ratios (and other potential resizing/format conversion issues).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Faisal Humayun</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-12707105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Big deal...  who cares&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awake</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-9008749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. I have always wanted to see the admin panel of the one of the popular sites.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 06:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8904362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Livecrunch&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@JoeHobot</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:33:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8891615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was surprised to see the screenshots and no idea of who's admin account is this.If it is not a fake-twitter should have a security.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seosoeasy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 07:42:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8888473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this is why i don't have a twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">asdf</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 01:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8883619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;social engineering still works :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">christon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8874028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice find and it seemed authentic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laptapos</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8872699</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think is a fake guys. &lt;a href="http://admin.twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="admin.twitter.com"&gt;admin.twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; has open port to internet even now and shouldn't pose a problem to a black hat to gain access. &lt;br&gt;Doing all that photoshop tricks sounds a little lame, I mean the guys bothered to spoof all the details and forgot about right corners.&lt;br&gt;All photos show a very simplistic back-end interface and that's exactly twitter style.&lt;br&gt;If it proves to be a fake, then that will be an amazing fake. &lt;br&gt;Meanwhile twitter should restrict their admin panel access outside their local network.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Radu Boncea</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8872420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's an all text page: Just save a copy of a real page from the site to your desktop, open in an HTML editor, change the text in the middle, then reopen in a browser -- you don't have have to worry about picking fonts or colors, because it's all in the existing stylesheet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seems easier to me than picking fonts, colors, and alignments in PhotoShop.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Bauser</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:51:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8871068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me guess, username admin and password password?? :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Gaudet</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8871031</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How would it be easier to create HTML for all these instead of Photoshopping them?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericbieller</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:11:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8863171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They are false. In one of the pitures, the trashcan is in the middle between two tweets. If you take a look, you will notice that the left corners are round and the right corners are not round. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:51:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8862910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty cool, when do hackers stop? never?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:41:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8862749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, we know @crystal got her account hacked at least once, because that was the start of the "celebrity accounts hacked!" story in January: &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/01/professed-twitt/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/01/professed-twitt/"&gt;http://www.wired.com/threat...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So these could be shots somebody saved then. Or, maybe ANOTHER admin got his/her account cracked.  Maybe Twitter should give some security lessons to its staff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Bauser</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:36:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8862478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would somebody bother photoshopping an all-text webpage? Way easier just compose it in HTML and screenshot it. The fuzziness is probably an artifact from shrinking the image to fit in a blog post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Bauser</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8862386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not really surprising. With worm attacks, server downtime, and weird glitches (like disappearing tweets and user photos), I doubt any engineers at Twitter have time to focus on anything except repair work. They could really stand to hire a few more programmers just for R&amp;amp;D.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Bauser</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:22:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8861808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Was just saying I look forward to seeing how it plays out.&lt;br&gt;1. If it turns out to be an accurate or False Claim.&lt;br&gt;2. If the Screen Shots from the French blog get traced to a particular person.&lt;br&gt;3. If the supposed hacker gets found out or into any trouble.&lt;br&gt;3. If Twitter will respond in any way to the security of the site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Styer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8861710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ruby on Rails has security holes?  No way!  (hahahaha)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">j</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:56:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8861318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As much as it was interesting to see the behind-the-scenes world of Twitter, as part of an application development company, this is the last thing I would want to see on a reputable site like Mashable.  BTW, does Twitter not have decent UI people on their team?  The UI of this backend is pretty bad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cent</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:41:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8861170</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is already disclosed to the general public. News like this spreads like wildfire on forums and blogs. Also, please take into consideration that we've included only a tiny, very benevolent portion of the screenshots in our article. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stan_Schroeder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:34:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8861104</link><description>&lt;p&gt;simpsons did it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">forbetaorworse</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8860890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;can anybody tell me what is sooo interessting on these screenshots....? &lt;br&gt;i mean ok its the admin interface of twitter but....ok..and now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Georg Krueger</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:20:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Inside the Twitter Admin Panel</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/30/twitter-admin-panel/#comment-8860676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a big fan of Mashable, and have been an every day reader since I first found the site. Follow you on twitter and pull your rss in my google reader (which doesn't update very well btw).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, I feel the need to voice my displeasure over this article. Someone is able to get into a restricted area of a website, and you help them get even more attention by posting the results of their exploits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did you ever think that perhaps Twitter wouldn't want this section of their sight disclosed to their general public? Personally, I find this article really irresponsible. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>