<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Mashable - The Social Media Guide - Latest Comments in 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet and Technology News - Mashable is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Networking news. With more than 5 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web.</description><atom:link href="https://mashable.disqus.com/18_million_twitter_users_by_end_of_2009/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-17005169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;twitter can sometimes be overwhelmed with robots but seems to work well to have some fun.  just like &lt;a href="http://ClubDistrict.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="ClubDistrict.com"&gt;ClubDistrict.com&lt;/a&gt; Nightlife Simplified &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/1e1F3f" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/1e1F3f"&gt;http://bit.ly/1e1F3f&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ginote</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16804451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would be interesting to see facebook numbers at the same time as a company.  Rather then presently. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan Lalji</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:05:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16800283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that FaceBook has much more fans than Twitter. LOL&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Source Control</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:11:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16683559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not saying that fb makes less money than twitter or that it doesn't make money: certainly who is on fb is there for a ludic experience, to play, that must be the second big revenue of the net ...after porn!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edoardo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16622628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to take these research figures with a grain of salt as they vary across the board from comScore to McCann to Forrester to eMarketer. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francesco Paciocco</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:45:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16609261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am very interested in why everyone is talking about twitter!  I don't even know how to get into the website with my opinions  I would love to talk about world affairs because I have been involved with politics and other important things going on in this world today and yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patricia Cotten</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16596432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For who's using t, check out "Twitter Is Now All I Have" &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/nGlwh" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/nGlwh"&gt;http://bit.ly/nGlwh&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mahasti</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:47:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16593855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter deserves 18 million users.&lt;br&gt;Of course they'd better be users that actually use the service and not just placeholders.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Lalonde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16590119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter vs Wave : &lt;br&gt;im not mean ppl promptly move from Twitter to Wave. Surely they will use both at the first time. but by Google product convergence, they possible to use Wave for their short message finally. It depend on how Wave well blend with other Google products (mail, map,...) and making more user experience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twitter vs FB : &lt;br&gt;by PR &amp;amp; Marketing point of view,&lt;br&gt;many number of twitter-er come for sell their product. moreover, they come for sell someone else products.  so that's mean a part of this community is seller community.&lt;br&gt;but ppl who love to play games, come for chat and upload their party pics is the real customer. its mean fb is the real customer community.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TedDiEz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:16:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16587075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wave kills Twitter? its more complicated than that: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://microgeist.com/2009/08/twitter-vs-google-wave/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://microgeist.com/2009/08/twitter-vs-google-wave/"&gt;http://microgeist.com/2009/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IMHO 18 Milion Twitter users is more social than 250M in fb, most of the people are on fb to chat or to upload pics from holidays: fb is nothing new and will not last.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edoardo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:52:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16586636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;im using Twitter too. &lt;br&gt;but honestly, i think Twitter will be die when Google launched Google Wave.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TedDiEz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:40:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16586293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how 18M &amp;gt; 250M ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TedDiEz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:29:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16585676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is far from the results of Facebook, it has to improve on reliability!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Addami</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:12:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16585577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is far from the results of Facebook, it has to improve on reliability!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Addami</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16585428</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To get the facts you have to read the article and look at the survey figures. Not many did. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The projected figure of 18 million for 2009 is for US adult users only. The rapid growth of Twitter in the UK, plus the rest of Europe, Australaisa and wherever on the globe - it's a big world outside of the US - will probably take the figure nearer to 35 million. Who knows? Twitter will, at the end of the year. Exponential growth is phenomenal and may surprise everyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Jagger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16584845</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These figures are still far to those of Facebook, Twitter has yet to improve in the reliability!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Addami</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16584793</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These figures are still far to those of Facebook, Twitter has yet to improve in the reliability!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Addami</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:40:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16581487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter needs more time to be in the position of Facebook!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arijit Das</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:56:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16581479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's odd because lately I've been seeing a quoted figure of 40-44 million Twitter users/visitors globally with a slight majority of users outside the U.S. eMarketer should talk to Comscore &amp;amp; figure out who's right. ; )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:56:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16581246</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting statistics. But would been more interesting to see how this growth was compared to other Social Networks like Facebook, MySpace etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers.. Are&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TwtrCoach</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16581117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not too suprising at the numbers, many people abandon Twitter fast when they realize the few activites they can do there.  Twitter needs to find a way to allow users to interact more, and maybe (*Possibly*) integrate with another social network, like Myspace or Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicoleta</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16581106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Out of those 18 Million how many are still active? How many actively contribute? How many are Spam accounts? Twitter to me is just a way to get news. My use of twitter is in no way shape or form a scial one but more of a information hub. facebook on the ither side...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">P Cora Jr.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:43:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16580918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a bit understated, should be more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BullishChina</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:38:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16580843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter &amp;gt; Facebook&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">You Rae</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 18 Million Twitter Users by End of 2009</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/09/14/twitter-2009-stats/#comment-16580522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It confirms that Twitter is nothing compare to Facebook... I don't understand the buzz arround twitter: nobody's using it !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Furious Angel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:28:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>